At last year a challenging post youve got to use to know. I have no doubt that what happened was criminal. Defense concentrated not to do this 1000000000. 00 industry these companies have a huge financial motivation to sow these problems there are numerous stocks showing that doctors were keen to test factory concentrates for the insights of its own that Patients Want gives them doctors the wrong place going through stuff why they would keep me consecutive doses day. In people. And im always questioning or so i dont like being on our way to live when so many have. The impact of the upcoming fight for the Supreme Court on the 2020 alexion on this edition of politicking. Welcome to politicking on larry king while confirmation of a 3rd trump nominated supreme god justice looks virtually certain the impact on the 2020 alexion is a highly politicized question mark and will get one on one perspective from 2 men who come from very different protestant camps but who share experience working in
Flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor and litigation now without any controversy between the actual parties to the case. Instead of promptly granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, judge sullivan denied two defense motioning opposing any amicus at all, appointed mr. Gleeson to usurp the job of prosecutor, and went forth to right theening wrotes he perceived. To right the wrongs he perceived. The job of the United States attorney is otherwise occupied. In adding these unconstitutional burdens of process to punish Michael Flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of the unbiased, impartial adjudicator this court extolled in the 2019 chapter of that case saga. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this novel article three excess. Judge sullivans petition for rehearing must be flatly denied with clear language that a judge has no injury and no standing to seek relief of this courts rulings. Because judge sullivan
The court. His class is about 75 minutes. All right, today we are going to be looking at is the development of Controversial Supreme Court nominations in the late sixties and early seventies. We are looking at the war in court, this increasing surge of controversial decisions from the court. Theres basically two basic principles. This idea that it was a particular job of the Supreme Court to stand up on behalf of people who may not have majority support, whether it was atheist, Civil Rights Activists, or criminal defendants throughout the 1960s. Second, the emergence of this philosophy that some historians have called rightsrelated liberalism. The idea that liberalism was primarily for the protection of individual rights. As a result, the Supreme Court became an important mechanism for this. One problem, that is if youre going to be governing, you have to be able to appoint Supreme Court justices and as we will see this becomes a froth prospect for liberals. The backdrop, london be joh
We will and with a brief rebuttal from mr. Flynns counsel and the council of United States. Please proceed. Thank you chief judge, may it please the court, general flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor, and litigation without controversy between the parties to the case. Instead of granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, John Sullivan denied defense motions, appointed mr. Gleason to usurp the job of the prosecutor, raised perjury but as iter his head, was noted, the job of United States attorney is occupied. Adding the unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, John Sullivan discarded any semblance of the adjudicator. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Required. Gs are judge sullivans position for rehearing must be flatly denied with language that a judge has no injury or standing to seek relief in this court. Sullivan has invested himself in the prosecution of general flynn, it is mandated disqualification for the glaring appeara
Full court has now reversed them as well. Without basis in law and precedent any where in our court system and has sell oral arguments for august 11th to effectively retry general flynn and persecution of him as of 3 years has not been more than enough to watch as a corrupt politically corrupt department of justice and federal bureau of investigation needed the help of the leftwing judges who make up the Dc Circuit Court of appeals. 7 of those 11 judges appointed either by bill clinton or barack obama. Thats right, this is an obvious and outrageous politically motivated judiciary. 7 of the 11 judges left wing and acting as if they not constituted a leftwing organization. It is a disturbing trend to say the least emerging in our legal system, progressive groups and leftwing billionaires like george soros are packing courthouses and district attorneys offices with leftwing sympathetic judges and prosecutors all across the country, all who support the radical lefts agenda and then most ca