sotomayor had joined the may already in striking down abortion rights. liberals would ve lost their minds. and that s what it felt like for a lot of republicans. so that was the problem they. had justice after justice being appointed by republican nominees and they re not voting the way they wanted to. there were people on the court and then they couldn t control how they ruled. and what good was the power of getting justices on the bench if they just went liberal on you? i think they came to understand that they had a problem, and there are two components to the problem. the first was they weren t getting their conservative justices enough to ensure that they were only selecting the most died in the wall true believers. and then secondly, once they were on the court, they were losing them to other influences. they seemed to drift away from their previous far-right positions. now it is my personal opinion this was likely the result of the realities of judging. not to mention the insuff
the way they wanted to. there were people on the court and then they couldn t control how they ruled. and what good was the power of getting justices on the bench if they just went liberal on you? i think they came to understand that they had a problem, and there are two components to the problem. the first was they weren t vetting their conservative justices enough to ensure that they were only selecting the most die in the wool true believers. and then secondly, once they were on the court, they were losing them to other influences. they seemed to drift away from their previous far-right positions. now it is my personal opinion this was likely the result of the realities of judging. not to mention the insufficiency s of right-wing legal dogma. for someone like leo, he had to come up with a solution. they all did. i think he came up with a twofold solution. you can see it in his actions. first, make sure there is a mechanism for vetting true believers. i mean early on, a farm system f
there are a lot of women who do not plan to have complications in the pregnancies, although america is higher on the list of dangers pregnancies then most developed nations, by a long shot. but tell me what happened in your pregnancy, what was the process that led you to almost dying because you couldn t be provided with the services you need? absolutely, first and foremost, i think it s worth noting that it took about a year and a half of fertility treatment to get pregnant. when my husband and i found out that we were expecting, we were completely just over the moon, ecstatic. for about 17 and a half weeks, things were going really well. and then one day shy of 18 weeks, i had some curious, unexpected symptoms and found out very, very quickly that i had a condition called insufficiency, or incompetent cervix which just basically
law. i spent two hours on it today. the new york election law only relates to campaigns for public office in the state of new york. he cannot try to boot strap a new york state election law violation to raise this to a felony. state election laws do in the apply to a presidential race. noise that it is selective prosecution. it is duplicitous, there is four counts for one act. did he intend to do it because it wanted to keep it for his wife and family, and the main witness is a perjurier. when he opens his couth you have to assume he is lying. the issue of the jurisdiction and the statute of limitations and the, you know, the factual insufficiency, there is nothing in there that a defense attorney can prepare for. it is absurd. and let me say one thing about
federal crimes pertaining to this indictment will continue to speak truth to power. i will continue to provide transparency to the american people. it s amazing how once again, donald is trying to shift all of the blame, which he s so good at. it s always somebody else s fault. trump s lawyers vowing to fight the charges emotion. to dismiss his coming on several grounds. prosecutorial misconduct. selective prosecution for sure will be two of them. legal insufficiency is another one. the judge in this case has not imposed a gag order on the former president or anyone else. but he did warn the participants in this case, not to say anything that would incite violence or impact the proceedings. of course. the former president then went on to call the judge quote trump hater . but since trump is now a candidate for the presidency, any restrictions on his speech really raised. constitutional questions. so once again former president trump taking us to constitutional controversies that have r