and finally, your honor, i ve also provided the case of thompson versus state, 934, southern 2nd district, and beginning on page 5 of this copy, again, in the secondhand column they talk about the generalized burden and they say this when moving for judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence, the defendant admits not only the facts deduced in evidence, admits, but also every conclusion favorable to the state that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence. so, your honor, as to whether the state has met its burden at
before the hearing let me do this. chairman, stick around for a minute. i want to ask you about this irs story. ambassador pickering, you led this investigation along with admiral mullen. and the criticism about this investigation is, it didn t go far enough. you didn t specifically interview secretary of state clinton. you didn t probe into what she did or did not do in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. you focused on lower level officials and didn t sufficiently address the very point the chairman brings up, which is why wasn t there the sufficient address to the fact that there was a deteriorating security situation if benghazi? let me say that i hope the chairman has read our report. our report has 29 recommendations. the bulk of them concern the insufficiency of the state department s preparation of that post to deal with the security challenges. i don t think that there is any other explanation. and i can t believe that in fact, he still sits here and makes those charge
sufficient address to the fact that there was a deteriorating security situation if benghazi? let me say that i hope the chairman has read our report. our report has 29 recommendations. the bulk of them concern the insufficiency of the state department s preparation of that post to deal with the security challenges. i don t think that there is any other explanation. and i can t believe that in fact, he still sits here and makes those charges. the second issue he raised was the seven hours. we looked into this extensively with the military. admiral mullen. talking about the night of the attack? the night of the attack in benghazi. and admiral mullen and i and all the other members of the board concluded, after the testimony in which we interviewed many people, that there was no way that any military activity could have been put in place to deal with that will particular question. chairman of the joint chiefs and others have said nobody could have gotten there in time.
i don t know if this judge jeffrey meinhardt is lazy or scared. typically judges right decisions on this type of thing and write decisions for presidential reasons so people can look at precedent how people can judge it what people can do and can t do. i think this is such a high profile case. why wouldn t this judge write a decision on it? also you are saying why wouldn t the judge let it go to the jury? because he admits several of dismissed several of these counts on motion to dismiss by defense attorney saying insufficiency of the evidence. i heard that testimony in the courtroom and there was eyewitness said i heard the baby crying going for air, having respiratory why wouldn t you let that go to a jury? bob: can i ask your co-counsel here, mr. gutfeld? kimberly: mr. gutfeld. bob: did you know judges could throw out things that people have been indicted for? i didn t know that did you know that? kimberly: yes. it s a huge problem. greg: if i can figure this out, the
i don t know if this judge jeffrey meinhardt is lazy or scared. typically judges right decisions on this type of thing and write decisions for presidential reasons so people can look at precedent how people can judge it what people can do and can t do. i think this is such a high profile case. why wouldn t this judge write a decision on it? also you are saying why wouldn t the judge let it go to the jury? because he admits several of dismissed several of thesco motion to dismiss by defense attorney saying insufficiency of the evidence. i heard that testimony in the courtroom and there was eyewitness said i heard the baby crying going for air, having respiratory why wouldn t you let that go to a jury? bob: can i ask your co-counsel here, mr. gutfeld? kimberly: mr. gutfeld. bob: did you know judges could throw out things that people have been indicted for? i didn t know that did you know that? kimberly: yes. it s a huge problem. greg: if i can figure this out, the babies we