The committee will come to order. Good morning, everyone. Without objection the chair is authorized to declare a recess of the committee at any time. With that i would like to recognize myself to give an Opening Statement. Today, the committee is holdingg our third hearing this congress on a critical issue, facial Recognition Technology. It is clear that, despite the private sectors expanded use of technology, its just not ready for prime time. During this hearing we will examine the private sectors development, use, and sale of technology as well as its partnerships with Government Entities, using this technology. We learn from our first hearing on may 22 of 2019 that the use of facial Recognition Technology can severely impact American Civil Rights and liberties, including the right to privacy, free speech, and equal protection under the law. We learned during our second hearing on june 4 how federal, state and local Government Entities use this technology on a wide scale, yet abide
Of war and democracy. It is great to see you all here, and to have our friends at cspan sharing this wonderful content with their feelings. To their viewers. To those watching on our livestream at home, welcome. I would like to take a moment to recognize some individuals. First off, to we have any world war ii veterans or home front workers in our crowd tonight . [applause] do we have any veterans of any other era . Please stand. [applause] and do we have many members of our board of trustee . Thank you all for your service. Summer, we here at museum have been busy commemorating the 75th anniversary of major events in world war ii, the biggest of which was june 6 for dday, invasion at normandy. Some other recent major anniversaries include last month , on july 20, the assassination in the bunker. Er landings, the dragoon in Southern France took place. This week marks the 75th anniversary of one of the most glorious moments of the war, when the city of light, paris, w as liberated after
Here, sharing this content with their viewers. To those watching on the livestream at home, welcome. Moment,like to take a as we start, to recognize some individuals. First, do we have any world war ii veterans or homefront workers in our crowd . [applause] do we have any veterans of any other era . Please stand. [laughter] [applause] and do we have any members of our board of trustees . Thank you all for your service. The museum, we at have been busy commemorating the 75th anniversary of major events in world war ii. ,he biggest of which was june 6 dday, the invasion at normandy. Some other recent major anniversaries include last month on july the 20th, was the assassination attempt on bunker. N the lagoon landings in Southern France took place. This week marks the 75th anniversary of one of the most glorious moments of the war, when the city of light, paris, was liberated after four years of German Occupation. On the Eastern Front, following the massive soviet summer offensive, the r
A. Camp in mom or 4 times thats why it is strongly believed that the order came from the peak it came mainly from mark to roost them camp inside mark more iran is denying washingtons claims that it downed one of its drones on says all its Unmanned Aircraft have safely returned to base thursday president dollar trump says the warship u. S. S. Boxer destroyed an iranian drone in the strait of hormuz trump called it a defensive action because the drone came within a 1000 yards of the vessel and ignored multiple calls to stand down hes calling on other countries to condemn terror and work with the u. S. To protect shipping in the gulf i want to approach every one of an incident in the strait of hormuz today. Involving u. S. S. Boxer and Navy Amphibious assault ship the boxer took defensive action against an iranian drone which had closed into a very very near distance approximately 1000. 00 yards ignoring multiple calls to stand down and was threatening the safety of the ship and the ships
Size next Whose Research nevers institute for war holocaust and genocide studies is joining us on skype from. So so then this is the final court ruling on this particular case is it suggesting then that the state the netherlands itself is responsible at least in part for what was your swirsky massacre since the 2nd world war. Indeed this concludes the. Case of litigation which was started by the mothers of srebrenica and some of the relatives of men and boys who were murdered in 1905 and today the Supreme Court basically confirms an earlier ruling by id appeals courts which held that actually the dutch peacekeepers and also just states acted unlawfully by not offering protection for 850. 00 plus new york men and boys in 1905 and they also ruled the. Level of responsibility considering the entire context and all factors and factors at that time start stands at 10 percent where. Earlier courts still sense that the model of responsibility laid at 30 percent so thats actually the only diff