Slightly below average, it will be near average by the time we get to the coast and bay temps. Our big whopper of a low is in salt lake city. High pressure is beginning to nose in, that is a major system across the country. I expect temperature its starting off cool, 40s, 50s, get cooler. Look at that 43 mill valley 48. Hills burg 49 degrees. May not see another one like that are for awhile, end of the month. 60s, 70s, some 80s coming back. 401 did you get some sleep last night . Slept like a baby last night. You were up crying . That, too. You know, if they had lost i dont think i would have gotten any sleep. I went to bed happy. And you woke up happy. And i woke up happy, oh, yeah they won a championship. Good morning everyone. If you are driving down the roads soon we are going to check out your tracy commute and 580 you can see traffic is moving along pretty well. Now 205 before Mountain House parkway minor crash there, traffic is a little bit slow as you come through. The rest of
All right. Im going to take the opportunity of this lull to begin the session. So im not going to spend a lot of time on introductions. I do just want very briefly, with us from brookings and law affair, this is a real opportunity, because matt, my copanelists interviewee, im not sure what to call him when theres only two of us, has a real remarkable diversity of experience with 702. And so i actually met matt way back when he was working on gaugh guantanamo issues once upon a time. He became general counsel at nsa and went from there to run National Security. As i think youll hear a lot of 702 material. And so let me start by just asking you, on a scale of 1 to 10, how important is 702 to u. S. Counterterrorism mission and to other national skuecurity progrs and what other interests . If i can channel the movies, ill say 11, for those of you who have seen the movie. The amplifier goes to 11. Ive had a lot of conversations about and it is you know, it is important i think to understand
Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and to petition their government. Third, section 20
Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and to petition their government. Third, section 20
It reaches the part of the activity that is unrelated to the government preventative purpose. He was not accused of communicating with for viewing the probe while of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking. To view or were respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Occupy the law does not some sleepy First Amendment corner. It is a very platforms on which americans are likely to communicate to organize for social change and to petition their government. Could the state impose that . Your honor, i think they have much more authority to impose this. And limited and i think if you had something as sweeping as this, i dont think they could do that. Justice ginsburg. The most fundamental right is taken away. Some states prohibit sit science from voting. Some states prohibits being bearing arms. Those are constitutional ites. They are different. They are fundamental but they are different. In the case of voting, North Car