would impact their willingness to cooperate with the investigation. that means that someone or more than one person is cooperating with the doj. and number three, disclosure of the government affidavit would chill future cooperation in other high-profile investigations. what are those other investigations? the doj also adds, quote, the government does not object to unsealing other materials filed in connection with the search warrant whose unsealing would not jeopardize the integrity of this national security investigation. mark warner and marco rubio sent a private letter yesterday to the director of national intelligence and attorney general merrick garland to request more information on the records seized. and the ranking member of the house foreign affairs committee, mike mccall, made this argument on cnn earlier. the affidavit of probable cause in support of the warrant, we need to see that in congress on the intelligence committee. if it s such a national security thr
you know, allegedly revealed very sensitive intelligence in the oval office to the russians. i remember getting that phone call and my jaw dropping. i was just outside the oval office once when a group of reporters were in there and the president took fistfuls of classified information and waved them in front of the reporters and bragged about what he had access to. there was also a photographer in the room. afterwards we made sure pictures hadn t been taken. this was a big concern. what i will say that people aren t pointing to is how serious the information leveling is. secret information is defined under law as information that if released could cause grave damage to national security. top secret, if released, could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security. what we re talking about according to reports is information that s even above. that s what s called sci, sensitive compartmented information. these are the things we would worry about if donald trump looked at them,