change. the lawsuit alleges that the scorpion unit was responsible for the death of tyree nickels, and that they lack training and hiring standards for the specialized unit were subpar. there was also a decrease in standards they say across the entire department and they were hiring people that really they claim should not have been on the force. trump was joined by his co counsel, antonio revenue chee, as well as a retired memphis magistrate judge. all three attorneys saying that the intentional infliction of emotional distress or grounds for this lawsuit, if you remember brianna, it was shortly after tyree nichols was taken violently taken into custody that the lieutenant that was there at the scene went to nichols mother s home to claim that nichols was a d u i suspect despite having no evidence to back up those claims. in fact, the police report was riddled with inconsistencies and misleading information. you mentioned that those five officers involved in his beating death had been
entryways to go get a little girl s beloved pet goat. this is absolutely a gross miscarriage of justice and a failure of priorities. so somehow police drove something like 500 miles looking for this goat. they thought it was at one. um you know, sort of retreat. it wasn t they had to drive back and they found the goat and it was reportedly killed. so now the lawsuit. what s the crime here? what are you see? suing for we have a laundry list of crimes here going through the constitution. we have claims for violations of the first amendment. the fourth amendment , the 14th amendment were alleging viewpoint discrimination, unlawful search and seizure of violation of this little girl s due process rights as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress . because the bottom line is here, these officials knew of the property dispute. and in fact, my clients owned this scope and they went with a
have a laundry list of crimes here going through the constitution. we have claims for violations of the first amendment. the fourth amendment , the 14th amendment were alleging viewpoint discrimination, unlawful search and seizure of violation of this little girl s due process rights as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress because the bottom line is here , these officials knew of the property dispute. and in fact, my clients owned this scope and they went with a warrant drove 500 miles across several county lines to take this go and instead of abiding by the law and holding caesar until this issue was adjudicated, they turned him over for slaughter. they improperly acted as judge, jury and executioner. and that is not the role of the sheriff s . here is what the shasta district fair ceo said about why they would not allow this nine year old to keep the goat from being slaughtered. they said. making an exception for you will
basically swamp, this was found in his backpack, we believe, and it says and i quote: would bring a shovel to help bury a body and on the outside of the envelope says burn after reading. reportedly written by roberto laundrie to her son, brian laundrie after the death of gabby petino. this has come out as a part of a infliction of emotional distress lawsuit by gabby s family against the laundries and their lawyer. steve: right. well, here s the thing. for their lawyer to say oh, that was written before they made the trip. it s like who are they thinking about burying then? is there another dead body? we don t know about? steve: right. of course, the response by the laundries is well we don t have a duty to the petino family. but, if you look at what the petinos are arguing, they are
says burn after reading. now, so it went back and forth. the judge says i believe it is relevant and this case is proceeding to trial, all right? in florida. so the plaintiffs, the petitos will have a request to get that letter, but there will still be a battle. i want to tell you about this case. is intentional inflings of emotional distress ways. that time period when gabby was missing and the petitos were calling over and over and over again the laundries, texting them, do you know anything? they did not respond and they blocked them on facebook and they say that during that time that was intentional infliction of emotional distress. under florida law, it has to be outrageous behavior, beyond the norms of sissi. the laundries are saying we had no right we had no duty to you to have to respond to you. that is our right to stay silent at that moment in time. this case, if proceeding to