>> they're going to be a leader in the jury room. the other jurors are going to look to them for their sort of legal analysis, even though they're not supposed to be instructing them the law, they kind of can't help themselves. so it's a big gamble. it's a big risk, but on the defense, i think it's a very bold move you know, the risks involved if you're the prosecution, you don't want the lawyer on the jury the one that the other jurors look to clarify points you want those to be questions to the judge. >> if you need to communicate with them, if you're the defense side, maybe you want the lawyer on the panel. does that suggest hold on. they haven't really met some burden of proof or there's more of a nuanced either way, there's a risk that could be posed to either side here. but think about this now, we now some information about these juries. the jurors. we know that as of yesterday, at least one juror was concerned about sitting on this particular jury because she believed her anonymity they would be compromised. walk me through from a consultant's perspective, going from now on, the fact that we have some information now will the