let s move. let s move. let s move. let s move. don t reu.s. i will bust your [blank]. i will bust your head. it is time to deal with policing. the clips remind me of the clash between journalists trying to cover the story, the official riots and the police in missouri. alonging back, how much inflam step role did the media play in ferguson and the aftermath? one of the things about ferguson that was interest was the tension between gatekeepers and social media even with reporters who work for a legacy publication like the washington post the shot shows you. even if the institution, the
riots and the police in missouri. alonging back, how much inflam step role did the media play in ferguson and the aftermath? one of the things about ferguson that was interest was the tension between gatekeepers and social media even with reporters who work for a legacy publication like the washington post the shot shows you. even if the institution, the legacy publication play gatekeeper the reporters and people on the ground we saw this in gaza too people posting still photographs on twitter, raw video finding its way on to the web, that is what we saw. some of that is going to be inflammatory is okay word . but there is a positive find, a way to get out information.
in arizona, nobel prize winning krugman wrote in in new york times. citizens of other democracies may marvel at the american psyche, efforts by mildly liberal presidents to expand health coverage are met with tyranny and talk of armed resistance. still that s what happens when a democrat occupies the white house and a market for anyone willing to stoke that anger. that is a commentary that has come under some criticism. it may have started the ball rolling, the ball sarah palin ended up commenting on a few days ago. is paul krugman s characterization of the current political climate fair, in your opinion. no, shrewdly not. first of all, krugman, i think, was inflam tore. if you look at the media narrative today, much of this is a backward auto look at media debates and town halls in washington last year. today when you re seeing in the tea party is states organizing, montana, texas, missouri,
dealt with the cancer, get egg the psa test is an option four. there a danger in getting the actual screening test? why what is the downside of getting screened? right. it is an interesting question because you have a test, let s stay comes back elevated. what you don t know is what that means exactly. could it just represent inflam makes of the prostate, represent a very, very slow-moving cancer or might it represent an aggressive cancer? and the thing about this test is it simply cannot provide you that piece of information. we need a better screening test and we need to know how to analyze psas better than we do now but the concern is that if it comes back elevated, it may lead you down the road, first anxiety, then biopsy and possibly treatment and with treatment, again, you have significant potential risks, bowel dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, not insignificant numbers at all. so i think that is the biggest concern here. so, bottom line is if you are
inflaemd and inflammatory rhetoric about planned parenthood, about the sale of baby parts, about dismembering live babies, which was not accurate and not what the shown on the videos. when you use inflam at this rhetoric, you inflame people. it s this kind of rhetoric that helped create this environment. so is it what the shooter says, even though he may be deranged that you think has a direct link, correlation with what the pam, when exaggerate