Don t think of them. The pain becomes a part of you. Get everybody out here to my house now. He came home and found her, his entire family gone. I said what are you talking about, what are you saying? it was surreal. As fellow cops suspected him. I did not do this. I did not do this. She was upset. She felt like history is repeating itself. Or police just plain wrong? it s like a twilight zone. Lies become truth and the truth becomes lies. May be the real killer was still out there. You have lied to the police about this case. So devastating. We know that was probably the key to solving this. 13 years of hell. Such an awful crime. The wife, the little boy and girl, shot at pointblank range. I was dumbfounded with shock. How to comprehend it? i said what, wait, what are you talking about, what are you saying? the husband had an alibi. He could have done anything, but he didn t. 13 years, three trials, appeals, reversals and changing stories. The big picture here for a lot of people as i
the pain becomes a part of you everybody, to my house, now. his entire family, gone. i said what are you talkin about, what do you saying? and i really hear it was surreal his fellow cops suspected him. i did not do this, i did not d this she was upset she felt like history wa repeating itself he wants to have women an his wife was in his way. we are police wrong it s like the twilight zone lies become truth and the trut becomes lies maybe the real killer was still out there. you have lied to the police about this case? yes, sir. so devastating. we probably knew that thi was the key to solving this. 13 years, 13 years such an awful crime. the wife the little boy and girl. shot at point blank range. i was just dumbfounded, shocked at what i saw. how to comprehend what do you talking about what do you saying? the husband had an alibi. for ten minutes. he could have done anything he did 13 years, three trials, repeals, reversals and changin st
complicated. with no philandering husband, no molesting father, wha remained was the theory of the crime that david left th basque bony, killed his family then went back to place more once again, the prosecutors ar arguing the scene in the garag was staged to look like a se crime. her pants had been removed? correct removed after she d bee killed what s more, the position of kim s body, he argued, is no what you would expect for person who had been shot and fallen her feet are under the car, about roughly ten, 12 inches under the car. her legs were at an angle, which seemed unusual unusual how well, they weren t straight they were at an angle. you just would not expect them to be that way and the infamous sweatshirt the one that once belonged t charles beau nay, was also par of the staging, the prosecutor argued the placement of th sweatshirt was incriminating i thought the way it was put
sweatshirt had been identified as charles boney s. and just two days later, the cops brought boney in and started grilling him on how it ended up on the garage floor. that sweatshirt is in the middle of a crime scene of a triple homicide. somehow that sweatshirt got there, your sweatshirt. you explain to me how it got there. i have no idea. boney admitted the sweatshirt had once been his, but said he d dumped it in a salvation army dropbox about a month before the murders. it shows up at a crime scene. not laundered, not washed. if it would have went though the salvation army drop box, that would have been a clean sweatshirt. your dna, chances are, probably wouldn t have been on there, but it is. i see where you re coming from. as for david camm do you know david camm? no. you ever met david camm? no. do you remember the murder of david camm s family? on television, yes. do you know where david camm lives? only on television. i don t even know what his add
been in the database three months before the murders. it took one hour and one email to find charles boney. that could ve been done in 2002, had prosecutor faith done it. and you d think on a case on which, you know, children and a mom are murdered, ambushed in a garage, that they would bend over backward to do it right. stan faith was the prosecutor in trial one. the defense said, well, we asked you, the state, the prosecutors to send that out. to be balanced, to be tested against a national register of dna. i asked the lead investigator to do that. and he said, we didn t get anything. and that s why but, in fact, he hadn t sent it out at all. no, i think he sent it out. well, he hadn t sent the proper dna. faith says he later learned the detective sent out the wrong dna sample from the sweatshirt. mike mcdaniel, david s first defense attorney, didn t buy that. i think he s a liar. you don t think he ever ran it? no, i don t think he ever asked anybody to r