am i wrong. you may be wrong. here is the reason. this kind of ineffect am guty, privacy rights and women s health care, he declined to be specific. when i questioned him as well on whether individual rights should be elevated above corporate interests, he declined to answer the question. when i asked him about worker safety and consumer protection, he declined to answer specific questions. i know that nominees are often expected to avoid those questions they could come before the court. here, he is nominee of a president who established a number of clear litmus tests
least three of my colleagues two republican ands a fellow democrat and two of them repeated it publicly. i think that he feels that this kind of attack is abhorrent and outrageous. he must do it publicly otherwise he will seem to be ineffect agreeing with the president. he can to the do it behind closed doors in a private meeting, it isn t enough to do that. who do you think of senator schumer, he said this is they are in co hoots, who do you make of that theory. i think that senator schumer is one of the smartest and wisest person i know so it could
capable of stronger action offensively and defensively. but i don t think that the obama administration has put a priority on it until today. when the president announces weak and ineffect tich sanctions saying other steps will be taken, we can t talk about it, he has no credibility in that regard. i understand why you don t make public actions in cyberspace or elsewhere until they ve happened. but i do think in order to, not simply impose pain on the russians but to shame them publicly as well, to let the whole world know, including other potential hackers like beijing, that if you act against the united states we will impose such costs that you will not want to do it again. and i imagine that will be your advice to president-elect donald trump and he will have a markedly different approach as it relates to the actions against the united states. ambassad ambassador, always a pleasure. while tensions are
jennifer, do we have any word on whether anybody has been hurt by this thing? so far no reports of any injuries. remember, this is a helium-filled balloon that is the size of, you know, a football field. it is enormous. i have passed it many times driving through maryland and seeing it on the horizon as it watches the coast line and protects the homeland. but being field with helium. that s extremely flammable. so clearly a lot of concern about where this will come down and how to secure it once it comes down and whether it may, in fact, catch fire. you mentioned protecting the homeland. interesting to me, and i hadn t read about this until today, but last month the l.a. times did a full report and an expansive one, extensive one on this program. you mentioned it s supposed to be protecting the homeland. the l.a. times called this a 2.7 billion-dollar zombie project it says by zombie project means it s costly. ineffect actual and simply impossible to kill jlens
it really burns me up when we allow other countries to, as rob scott said, either subsidize their steel or dump it into our market and our workers lose their jobs. this is really the only country where that happens around the wrorld. it doesn t make us exceptional. it makes us exception alley stupid. we have trade laws on the books but we got to enforce them. how inferior is the steel being i believe ported compared to united states steel. it s really ineffect. steel making in the united states is less carbon sben sif i so there s less carbon output. there s less shipping costs. yourself close to the market. you can guarantee the quality because you know where to track down the company rather than finding them some place in china or korea. what s at stake here is reciprocity. we don t have this access to their markets and we don t