thing over and over and over again. where was the security? why won t hillary take? maybe hillary is the one person that can give me answers. she is the one that is running for president, and if she wants to be president, she has to give me answers. bill: what do you think about that? oh, yeah, i agree with pat entirely. i personally do not believe that hillary clinton is qualified to be president. it is not just because of benghazi. it is her entire history. from being a disgraced watergate lawyer, to being an ineffect wall senator and a secretary of state with no major foreign policy initiative to her name. i mean, so, pat and i are in contact with each other quite a bit and we both agree. bill: what i asked her at the end of our conversations, whether or not she thinks now that she will ever get answers. she was rather candid, she says she is not so sure. are you? exactly.
all the senators and congressmen saying they oppose the plan. the lobbying groups said they were going to use this in their scorecards of ineffect who is a real conservative here. and, howard dean, 26 republican senators defied the threats. yeah, i don t think there is anything you can t call these people conservative. they re just right-wing, destructive, groups that don t have america s interests at heart. for anybody to argue that you should let the united states refuse to pay its debts is irresponsible. and silly. so i think those organizations take a big hit. i think the club for growth, unmasked. not the club for growth at all. a group captured by the koch brothers. jim demint is evidently running the show at heritage. these people are off the charts. this is nothing conservative, refusing to pay your bills. conservatives pay their bills. so, i this is a huge loss for the republicans. it is a huge loss for, for the
about what he has done. it is how you talk about it. and vast amounts of money, a billion dollars go into it. i was fascinated with that story. how did that come about? and and you know, overcoming the economy is one thing. overcoming that internal debate is its own challenge in itself. a they ran other ads. better, more impact. the ad. average person looks at that. makes sense, not that hard to do. there is so much putting that together. the way they bought the tv time was absolute genius. they didn t have as much money as the romney campaign. and the romney campaign, we ended up learning at the end, ended up wasting it. by throwing it out to audiences that were ineffect, way too, the audience was too large for the ad. it wasn t targeted. explain thou that works. so, when people write about campaigns. they focus on things that were impressive. like the ground game. some of the technology. but some of the core technology that really made a difference was looking at the best val
they don t do those things. they either infringe on the right of law-abiding people and do nothing to keep the guns out of the hands of dangerous people. i m troubled this debate is about guns. it should be violence. violence is the problem, guns are what they re using. we had a kid build a bomb in a dorm room here recently. the point is, the fact of the matter is that we have a violence problem in the united states and we are missing a golden opportunity to have an open, honest, and serious conversation about why it is that we having are these horrific violent act oes curing in our society. because everyone s focused on passing these laws that are proven ineffect i have and will prove ineffective in the future. and finally i have to quickly ask you do you believe the honeymoon trip of jay-z and beyonce to cuba violated existing rules on u.s. travel there? well, i don t know where they went. if they didn t violate, it exposes the ridiculousness of the laws we have in place. we are
that will significantly boost the anti-aging enzyme found in red wine. testing is underway and according to one doctor the drugs would, quote, treat one disease, but unlike drugs of today would prevent 20 others. in affect it would low aging. tom first of all it is always the 2350 eu6 years uh the five years away. i was looking at this on 60 minutes . they are not saying it will slow aging. ineffect already means you are lying. and every time i look at this they say you have to drink they qifl lebt of six cases of water. i have done that and don t feel the benefits. do we want people to be living to 150? your crazy neighbors are living to 150.