the web and causes a stir. law bloggers from around the country take notice, including arizona lawyer, matt brown. i think it s pretty remarkable that a deputy in court helped themselves to a defense lawyer s file on video, not only did he have a look but then pulled the paper out and ended up making photocopies. in testimony following the incident, officer stoddard defends his actions, saying his concern was for the security of the court and he had reason to believe that document suggested mr. lozano intended to commit a crime. i don t see any security threat that would justify them taking a simple piece of paper out of the file. he should have told the judge, your honor, i saw something that gives me security concerns. i d like to look at it further. during subsequent hearings, the court finds that there s no security threat justifying the removal of the documents from the file and he is found in what s called indirect civil contempt, a violation of a court
country take notice, including arizona lawyer, matt brown. i think it s pretty remarkable that a deputy in court helped himself to a defense lawyer s file on video, not only did he have a look but then pulled the paper out and ended up making photocopies. in testimony following the incident, officer stoddard defends his actions, saying that his concern was for the security of the court and that he had reason to believe that the document suggested mr. lozano intended to commit a crime. i don t see any security threat that would justify them taking a simple piece of paper out of the file. he should have told the judge, your honor, i saw something that gives me security concerns. i d like to look at it further. during subsequent hearings, the court finds that there s no security threat justifying the removal of the documents from the file and he is found in what s called indirect civil contempt, a violation of a court order outside the immediate presence of the court.
video quickly finds its way to the web. law bloggers from around the country take notice, including arizona lawyer, matt brown. i think it s pretty remarkable that a deputy in court helped themselves to a defense lawyer s file on video, not only did he have a look but then pulled the paper out and ended up making photocopies. officer stoddard defends his action, saying his concern was for the security of the court and that he had reason to believe that the document suggested mr. lozano intended to commit a crime. i don t see any security threat that would justify them taking a simple piece of paper out of the file. he should have told the judge, your honor, i saw something that gives me security concerns. i d like to look at it further. during subsequent hearings, the court finds that there s no security threat justifying the removal of the documents from the file and he is found in what s called indirect civil contempt, a violation of a court order outside the immediate presen
video quickly finds its way to the web. law bloggers from around the country take notice, including arizona lawyer, matt brown. i think it s pretty remarkable that a deputy in court helped themselves to a defense lawyer s file on video, not only did he have a look but then pulled the paper out and ended up making photocopies. officer stoddard defends his action, saying his concern was for the security of the court and that he had reason to believe that the document suggested mr. lozano intended to commit a crime. i don t see any security threat that would justify them taking a simple piece of paper out of the file. he should have told the judge, your honor, i saw something that gives me security concerns. i d like to look at it further. during subsequent hearings, the court finds that there s no security threat justifying the removal of the documents from the file and he is found in what s called indirect civil contempt, a violation of a court order outside the immediate
indicated that mr. loadno intended to commit a crime. i don t see any security threat that would justify them taking a simple piece of paper out of the file. he should have told the judge, your honor, you ve given me security concerns, i d like to look at it further. during subsequent hearings, the court finds that there s no security threat justifying the removal of the documents from the file, and he is found in what s called indirect civil contempt, a violation of a court order outside the immediate presence of the court. a judge ordered stoddard to hold a press conference and publicly apologize for removing the document from her file or else go to jail. attorney craig marins represented the attorney s interest at the hearing on the order to show cause. he agrees with what the judge decided. i thought his ruling was very thoughtful, and i thought sanction really made sense. made common sense. just say you re sorry.