deadly, but they are actually effective. and now he s turned and gone back into the russia, he claims he s going to fix the situation because he claims that the russian military attacked his men. this has been a long simmering food between the russian defense minister and prigozhin, but prigozhin says he s doing something about it. we are unable to convert any of this, we have heard reports from ukrainians that they ve crossed into russia. that wagner group has crushed into russia. burgos russia is on high alert. moscow has tanks in the streets, they re calling it a coup attempt. he denies that s the case, it is all very confusing. but this guy is both volatile and dangerous. i will say on the american side, there is a concern. russia is a nuclear armed country, and having a whole bunch of people fighting about who s in charge of it is actually more serious than not. so, everybody tonight is on high alert about what s going on in russia. something is happening, we do not ha
russia wouldn t have the success that it s had if not for prigozhin and the wagner group. they re mercenaries, they re deadly, but they are actually effective. and now he s turned and gone back into the russia, he claims he s going to fix the situation because he claims that the russian military attacked his men. this has been a long simmering food between the russian defense minister and prigozhin, but prigozhin says he s doing something about it. we are unable to convert any of this, we have heard reports from ukrainians that they ve crossed into russia. that wagner group has crushed into russia. burgos russia is on high alert. moscow has tanks in the streets, they re calling it a coup attempt. he denies that s the case, it is all very confusing. but this guy is both volatile and dangerous. i will say on the american side, there is a concern. russia is a nuclear armed country, and having a whole bunch of people fighting about who s in charge of it is actually more serio
evidence in the trial, including grand jury testimony from the witnesses who testified against trump. leading off our discussion tonight, is glenn kirschner, former federal prosecutor and msnbc legal analyst. he is the host of the justice matters podcast, and also with us again tonight is bradley p. moss, a national security attorney. thank you both for coming here. glenn, explain this move to us. it is a move to delay calls for concern about the case? no jonathan, i think it s thoroughly and surprising. i don t know that all legal analysts agree to everything all the time, but i think when we all saw judge aileen cannon set the trial date for august 14th, our immediate reaction was, that trial date is not going to hold. now, we understand why she did it, the speedy trial act provides that somebody is to be taken trial within 70 days of their agreement. so judge cannon i think
smith sent saying listen, we re not even required to give you all of the witness statements or all of the greentree transcripts, ordinarily prosecutors only give up for the january transcripts for the witnesses. they intend to call a trial. but boy, jack smith went above and beyond and said we re going to give you all of the grand jury transcripts. so what does that mean? that means that donald trump now knows all of the witnesses who went into the grand jury and what they testified to about his crimes. which is probably why he arop did in that post, and expressly urged congress to quote stop this now. which feels a little obstruction of justice-ish to me. yeah. yeah. let me get you on one more thing. do you think that, speaking of power moves, glad, this is a question i asked harry lippman last night. do you think that this is jack smith s attempt, by giving him all of this stuff, hey dude, here s the case against you.
the discovery letter that jack smith sent saying listen, we re not even required to give you all of the witness statements or all of the greentree transcripts, ordinarily prosecutors only give up for the january transcripts for the witnesses. they intend to call a trial. but boy, jack smith went above and beyond and said we re going to give you all of the grand jury transcripts. so what does that mean? that means that donald trump now knows all of the witnesses who went into the grand jury and what they testified to about his crimes. which is probably why he arop did in that post, and expressly urged congress to quote stop this now. which feels a little obstruction of justice-ish to me. yeah. yeah. let me get you on one more thing. do you think that, speaking of power moves, glad, this is a question i asked harry lippman last night. do you think that this is jack smith s attempt, by giving him all of this stuff, hey dude, here s the case against you. you might as well just come on,