charlottesville and indeed many vulnerable people around the country who have suffered assaults in the last 18 months with the rise of the trump campaign and subsequent presidency. this is part of a general pattern of minimizing and denying the power of white supremacy and how much it threatens vulnerable communities. professor, just last question. do you have any hope moving forward? my hope is that what i saw in charlottesville, which was a mass mobilization of many members of the community from students to clergy members to business owners, many different sectors of the community banded together. it was a great show of solidarity to reject this. i wish that the officials of the university of virginia and the town had been more attentive and that the police would have intervened in many of the assaults that took place. but what i saw from kind of rank and file civilians gave me a lot
here s what it does. cuts the corporate tax rate, cuts taxes for individuals. in fact, according to trump, everyone who pays taxes, high income, low income, everybody gets a cut. the plan eliminates most deductions which i like since deductions are usually just loopholes, special deals for those who had lobbyists to get them for them. and i bet you don t have a lobbyist. trump s plan does keep deduction for home mortgage interest and charitable giving which is good sin tentive to give. trump says his plan will jump start the economy and jobs because people, that would be yu you, get to keep more of your money. democrats say it is a giveaway to corporate billion heirs. it might not even matter what democrats say. because if all republicans go for the trump tax plan, it will become law. republicans hold the majority in both the house and the senate. the key is the word all all republicans. and remember, not all republicans supported trump s obamacare repeal, and that is now, well, it s
so there you go, chris. the comments from president putin surrounding the senate investigation. let me send it back to you. thank you, jeff, who moderated the panel for us. then there is this from president put than morning. a preview of his tentive meeting with secretary of state rex tillerson and the two nations joined fight against isis. that is one of the topics, fighting terrorism. you know better than myself. however, that not the efficient work we need to interact not only with the department of state but also cia, without constructive work with our colleagues in these agencies, we ll not attain positive results. tillerson in turkey today to meet with the nation s president ahead of his trip to brussels for his first ever nato summit friday. joining me now, former u.s.
blind. deaf. inattentive, without notice. you re not supposed to go through a dictionary trying to belittle people. fools do that kind of stuff. so i said, can you not call me that word, fool? you feel me? call me that again, they ll be problems. i ll call you what i want. from there it just i will to stop talking. if i d have said more, it would have escalated it. i guess he felt i was stresses him out. i m going through, [ bleep ], i m going to try to kill you, period. you lock two people in a room like this and especially when you lock them down and don t allow them out for showers and phone calls, what happens is, they start taking out their frustrations on each other. so before i subject myself
is fair to say he s been inattentive. some nukes were pulled out of south korea because you would hope that north korea would reciprocate in kind. the question is what influence do we have to exert on china to get china to put some pressure on north korea? right now china this week said they re very unhappy with what the north koreans did. it s a threat to them. so china, the question is, why aren t you acting, china? you provide food, energy to north korea. they are their patron. when you see this kind of behavior, it pushes the united states into a position where we could say to japan, where we could say to north korea, to south korea, go ahead, build nuclear weapons to confront the north koreans. that s not in china s interests. that s the only leverage we have at this point, going after china. juan?