a perception of a war on women from the right is the refusal to accept the bleeding obvious. it is so not because kids don t know how to put a condom on. oh, if only they had a free condom. to the contrary, it isn t. actually it is. where you can statistically prove there is more awareness [ overlapping speakers ] more contraception being sold and being used. right. in those areas abortion rights are coming down. it s inarguable. no. it can be inarguable the two things are happening at the same time. to claim that one caused the other takes a lot more evidence than what you have. i mean, a lot of things, maybe obama being president has caused women not to have abortions because they re so happy they love the first black president. there s no proof that one leads to the other. do you think there s proof more are using contraception? there is proof that with the greater availability of contraception and abortion there will be more ill legitimacy, more abortions. look at
from the right is the refusal to accept the bleeding obvious. it is so not because kids don t know how to put a condom on. oh, if only they had a free condom. to the contrary, it isn t. actually it is. where you can statistically prove there is more awareness [ overlapping speakers ] more contraception being sold and being used. right. in those areas abortion rights are coming down. it s inarguable. no. it can be inarguable the two things are happening at the same time. to claim that one caused the other takes a lot more evidence than what you have. i mean, a lot of things, maybe obama being president has caused women not to have abortions because they re so happy they love the first black president. there s no proof that one leads to the other. do you think there s proof more are using contraception? there is proof that with the greater availability of contraception and abortion there will be more ill legitimacy, more abortions. look at it over decades as opposed to
side is doing everything except focusing on the real issue. democrats are in danger right now of sounding tone deaf to the people who are surprised at some of these outcomes. democrats need to eat some humble pie and show real concern for the people getting these notices. i think republicans need to also show a little bit of human milt. they seem to be completely indifferent to the losers in the last system and now they seem to be completely indifferent to the winners in the new system and seem to be grandstanding. none of this is good for the country. i don t think we should be dragging nixon into this. how would you handle you look at the scale of dishonesty in the tweets from the white house that says, obama care doesn t require in into lose their insurance. that is plain a lie. what would you call it. here s what i honestly think. i think the president was overly broad in his assurances to the american people. that s inarguable. he clearly should have been more precise with
obamadministration foreign policy, we can do this, we can make a difference, we should do this, we should make a difference, evidence is irrefutable, intelligence, inarguable. i think that s that s right. the intelligence is inarguable, it s american credible on the line. but i don t understand the kind of military actions they re talking about doing where on the one hand they re saying no boots on the ground, limited. how does that achieve the objectives they haven t really articulated? i don t sigh it does and the whole point of all this is iran is watching. what happened there s only one thing worse than not acting and that s acting and failing. and that s my worry about this. that you can do an action, american military action, and then not succeed in deterring him, not succeed in degrading his chemical warmaking able and then you have an emboldded ended iran who says america will act but only go so far so i m going to keep going with my nuclear
relative to what s going on in the private sector. by a very small fraction. by a very small fraction. this has been going overall the cumulative effect is huge. it s small quarter to quarter but the cumulative effect is huge, inarguable. about 4 million jobs. what do you mean by huge? the overall effect? no, it s not. those are taxpayer dollars consumers would be spending elsewhere. i will qualify it for you private sector gdp growth is 13.2% once you factor in government s drag that brings the overall down to 9%. basically, government is dragging down this economy by approximately one-third, 4 million jobs. the dollars the government isn t spending are dollars being left with the consumer and people in the private sector to spend on their own. the government doesn t create any value in the economy. money is money. we have to leave it there. the government has been spending trillions have dollars.