endangers that claim. that was the point that bolton and cupperman made. they said we have never done anything like that, and we don t want mulvaney in our action. they claim they re completely neutral. they will do what the court directed them to do. whereas in mulvaney s case he appeared to be pro-executive. he had a position in the case, and they didn t want his position to tar their more neutral position. it is striking to me that a lot of this we have talked about this a bit before as we head into the formal part of this process. these fights between the branches who has to testify and who doesn t, there is very little jurisprudence on it and very little guidance by the courts. it is a kind of power struggle between these two branches about who has what power in what scenario, right? yes. but there are two layers of analysis here.
endangers that claim. that was the point that bolton and cupperman made. they said we have never done anything like that, and we don t want mulvaney in our action. they claim they re completely neutral. they will do what the court directed them to do. whereas in mulvaney s case he appeared to be pro-executive. he had a position in the case, and they didn t want his position to tar their more neutral position. it is striking to me that a lot of this we have talked about this a bit before as we head into the formal part of this process. these fights between the branches who has to testify and who doesn t, there is very little jurisprudence on it and very little guidance by the courts. it is a kind of power struggle between these two branches about who has what power in what scenario, right? yes. but there are two layers of analysis here. one is in the typical oversight area, that is nonimpeachment oversight, typically the
that nobody believes anything. mulvaney sold out or as cashout explains on his song cashing out, i m cashing out, skate on my ice just like you playing hockey. grab your camcorder, press record and go and watch me. you know, we expect entrepreneurs to cash out more than public servants. mulvaney is clearly fine cashing out his blee beliefs for the currency of power. to paraphrase cash out one more time, let s press record and watch him because he sure doesn t sound like he used to. i think anybody who is up to speed on budget issues should be scared to death by what s happening with the debt and the deficit in this country. if you re not losing sleep over it, you re not paying attention. jamie harrison is actually running for senate in mulvaney s home state of south carolina and joins me when we re back in 30. thank you. joins me when we re back in 30 thank you get ready crab fans
someone who thinks like him as his chief of staff with a possible government shut down looming, the president certainly has that in mulvaney who pushed for his fair share of them as he was one of the founders of the freedom caucus. back to you all. pete: he is one of the founders of freedom caucus. a movement conservative. a true believer. the only thing he has been an outlier on with this white house is on defense spending. he has wanted to cut that budget. a lot of the president s supporters think it should be bigger. interesting pick. jedediah: i like him. budget hawk not afraid of a shutdown. the left talking points government shut down end of the world. government shut down means a lot of the government still stays open and at some point you have to draw the line and debt is out of control. it s a national security threat to have your debt thatch out of control good for him and i hope he sticks to it. ed: big stories we have been talking about all morning and something big coming