So good to see you again. When this all happened last night, i thought of many things, but i did think of you, and ill tell you why. Its evidence related. You have used your knowledge, your program over the many months of this to talk about how initially it was pretty clear that the Justice Department was not going beyond the events of that day, and you and i talked about that. Other reporters have weighed in, and im curious even though i know you have been talking about it for two hours how you think we got here. Because what we saw in this indictment that i thought was both strong, gripping and bad for the indicted donald trump, was how long and repeatedly they tried to end democracy in america. Yeah, the indictment is so harrowing, and i think that jack smith was at this for just ten months, obviously he built on all of the good work of the committee. I have learned that things are never as clean as what they appear, and we dont always have all the facts before them. But i think the
to mark your comeback after eight months out for this man! ivan toney scores in his first match back for brentford after serving a ban for breaching gambling regulations. it s sunday january 21. our main story: investigations are continuing into the deaths of four members of the same family at a house in norfolk. detectives have confirmed they re not looking for anyone else in connection with the incident. norfolk police has referred itself to the independent watchdog, saying it did not respond to a 999 call from the property. greg mckenzie reports. 45 year old mr koschinski seen in this photo was found dead at the property near norwich on friday morning. the two young girls who died at the same house are believed to be his daughters. police say a fourth person, a woman aged 36, who also died, had been visiting, but did not live there. police have revealed at 6am on friday morning, a man called 999 from the property, but officers were not deployed. an hour later, a member of
we re back with our coverage of this big speaking indictment that we have been making our way through since it first dropped about 25 hours ago. i m joined now by barry burke, a experienced attorney and play a key role in both trump in the meantime impeachments. welcome back. thank you, ari. pleasure to be here. this walks through things we knew and that the committee helped show. on the other it does add details and paints a fuller picture of this coup conspiracy. do you think it s a strong case? and what do you think of the points i raise about vice president pence? in all seriousness he could have been on the other side of this if he acted differently. you said it so well he didn t want to join the conspiracy. he saw what was happening and said, i m not engaging in criminality. in criminal cases often they present evidence of the people who recognize what was going on and didn t want to be part of it.
pretty well. i think people watched me in the last weeks during hurricane sandy with 18-hour days and getting up the next day and being effective in the job. senator bob menendez said he had no idea an unpaid intern in his office was an illegal resident and a sex offend per. had was arrested last week. he s unpaid. it s not like he s a staff paid person. number two, there s no way we could know about status. we ask about status. number three, there s no way we could know about any allegation as a juvenile what his background would be in terms of in criminality. california governor jerry brown is being treated for cancer. the 74-year-old is getting radiation for early stage pros prostate cancer. his prognosis is excellent. scott walker will not end
it will all be nice and legal. i m going to personally depose you. sean: joining me with reaction is the host of this new show right here on the fox news channel, justice with judge janine. good to see you. good to see you. sean: don t mess with him. he s one of the smartest lawyers i know. very bright guy. sean: let s look at this. i m a public figure. if they accuse me of any criminality, and i ve looked at this whole issue of malice, or that i m involved in criminality, a public figure has a cause of action here. wait a minute. accusing someone of a crime is defamation, per say. the issue is a public figure under new york times against sullivan, even if what he says is wrong and, a reasonable person would know it was wrong, you still don t win because you ve got to show malice or wreckless disregard for the truth. new york times against sullivan, you re out.