you do? i think porn is disgusting. i think it is massage nistic. i think it reinforces ideas of massagony. boo. i disagree with the idea of sexist in this story. sexist as being you don t support uh affirmative action. i think you can make the opposite argument that by supporting affirmative action that has an adverse affect in not making women equal, it probably, definitely does elevate some sexist ideas, but the way they define sexism in this it is wrong. i see. that is an interesting idea. i am sexist, but against porn. do i have a place in this discussion? do you see what i mean? yes. these feminist websites that quoted the study, i agree with them, but for the wrong reasons. i don t like porn because it is ungentlemanly and it is uncouth. in a victorian sense i am
for. didn t you write the segment? i absolutely did not. jay i wrote it and i i wrote it and i stand by it. you owe psychology women quarterly an apology. they don t publish recipes. yes, they do. but serious women can like meat loaf. they can. i agree with what ellison said. the jess bell statement says it is sexist. you can say it makes people equal. the problem is with the jesebel le e headline. in seriousness i think the result is interesting and doesn t say good things about porn and they should try to replicate the study and see if it is accurate and hopefully ask me to be a participant. more importantly it would be interesting to see a study that does attempt to find out what the jessebelle headline
criticism was it didn t go far enough. obviously. i would think you have to note it is obviously skewing left with these 200 something historians. i think it is an interesting study. it is a relatively low grade from people who were predisposed to like him. i think it is significant. why are historians so liberal? that s absolutely fair to say. it is silly to ask the story and judge a president still in office. and it is silly for historians to answer. only 200 or so responded of the 600 asked. they are not supposed to to be evaluating. they are supposed to say i don t know right now. i am a historian. it is not their area of spirit tease. a b minus on civil liberties ? it is more like a d if not an f. buzz the d stand for does the b stand for benghazi? does the b stand for conspiracy?
for transparency and accountability and a b for vision and general leadership and a b minus for civil rights and liberties. so basically he is not liberal enough for them. you know what could add nothing to this story? this. i rase i was right. is a b minus too high or too low? no idea. i am mott in the business of embraiding. i would gladly take a b minus myself. i do think that what you noted is important to point out and this is a study of what liberal historians saw. they praise him for the affordable care act, but their
those recipes, ladies, people who watch pornography are less likely to support affirmative action for women. looking at smut made males and females less likely to prefer preferential treatment for women. they say likely porn turns women to items of derision and object tau fight. in researching this story i came upon a video i found alarming. it is graphic so sensitive viewers should sit closer to the tv so they can see it better. i love the jazz soundtrack. can we even show that? allison, two-partquestion. what do you make of this study and do you find yourself becoming more sexist as you watch a lot of porn ace heard