valles was booked for murder when it had already notified the feds about the stolen car. but he declined an interview. in a statement, the sheriff s department says, denver has never and will never condone dangerous or violent individuals being on the streets. immigrants are not. immigrants or not. however, detaining anyone without a criminal warrant is a violation of the fourth amendment. bill: the sheriff has confirmed that he is full of it, it s bull, it is no violation of the law holding someone for the government.s none. the sheriff opposes sanctuary city, as does the mayor. in my opinion, both men have blood on their hands. that is the the memo. now, for the top story. reaction from inside mexico about all the immigration stuff. as you may know, the trump administration is cracking down hard on illegal alien criminals and will construct a border wall. so how are the folks south ofbo the border processing that?
what are you hearing? well, i m hearing from voters in arizona that there s some concern about how the administration is going to go about determining who is a criminal and who has actually broken the law. there s concern across the board regardless of lawmakers being republican and democrats about breaking up families. what will come of all of this still isn t clear. it does look like the administration will be more sympathetic to dreamers. to what extent, we don t know yet. we re standing by for the white house press secretary sean spicer. momentarily we re told that he will walk in his aides will walk in first, mark. this is a sean spicer, he has to get ready for some pretty serious tough questions right now. no doubt. certainly he has been away from the podium for a few days. we re used to seeing sean and taking questions. there s no question there s a lot coming down the pike right now. this immigration stuff is very complicated right now.
mexico to pay for the wall? we might not have to do that. they want to negotiate a deal and i want to negotiate a deal and we will see what happens, but we can always do a tariff or tax if necessary, and we will do that if necessary. if necessary we will do that. there s a lot of parsing of what he meant and whether he will stick to that, quite frankly. how he will impose a tax on mexico to pay for the wall or impose tariffs for jobs shipped overseas. is that an about-face to you? i am not going to hold him literally to those words right now, and i will tell you why? wall street has not. they pressed the pause button on tis, and they are looking at immigration stuff, and the wall stuff and tariff stuff and they said that s taking away from the policies, and you have goldman sachs putting out a statement
immigration ban. i think airbnb had been trying to offer people a place to say who were stuck. let me ask you about ceos. are they optimistic about the pro-growth policies? they want the president to pivot back to tax reform and away from the immigration stuff. reporter: absolutely, christine. whether it is the ceo of apple, or other companies, they are coming out hard against the order. they are still optimistic we may bring cash from europe back to the u.s. where you are and we may have corporate taxes going down. they are optimistic of the polipol poli policies. samuel burke. thank you. the president attacking a
play out and use the time available to them to put the thought and process in that they didn t put in before because the problem here is not actually one of substance. barack obama did many of the things that are actually in this executive order. it s all about the how and not necessarily about the what. whether it s the tweeting or it s the judge or it s russia or it s this immigration stuff, it s actually all about style and not about substance. you buy that? all style? i think it s about style and substance. it s a bit of both, number one. number two, i saw the vice president in the green room so we chatted, and i like him as a person, and it s tough to watch him twist like a pretzel to defend a precedence they is so difficult. you re probably right, chuck, it s not a moral equivalency, but an immoral equivalency and dr. king was a guest on this program in his beyond vietnam