campaign and the kremlin. here s what the president had to say. so we ll see what happens. would you be open to we ll see what happens. certainly, i ll see what happens. but when they have no collusion and nobody s found any collusion that any level, it seems unlikely that you d even have an interview. reporter: but that s not what the president said last year when he told reporters he is 100% willing to testify in the russia investigation. would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version of events? 100%. zroigood morning. i want to zero in here on daca and the wall and the big immigration mess that is confronting this bipartisan group in washington. you ve written so much about this. last night kellyanne talking to christopher cuomo about the president s evolving position about that big beautiful wall that would be paid for by
temporary reprieve. it says that they can remain in the country, they can continue to work. they can continue to live in their communities and they can reapply for daca status for another two years. that s huge, because the daca recipients have been waiting, their fate has been in the balance to see what congress was going to do. this doesn t end the debate around immigration reform, but this is a huge victory for the recipients. yeah, it s one piece of a very big and complicated picture and trying to figure out what the administration plans to do with that complicated picture. on the one hand the president talking about a potential pathway to citizenship, something you never would have heard him talk about on the campaign trail. on the other hand, the administration has moved to give only 18 more months for people from el salvador who are here on temporary protected status so i wonder how much sway do the courts have here and how important is you know, congress fixing the immigratio
deportation and lose their jobs, lose their ability to go to school on the disruption to america, there are hundreds of thousands of employers whose workers in the next few months because of this action. this is a very disruptive thing. i hope congress can come together and solve it by march, certainly. jon: boyd? i agree. i think this will be done by march for sure, but it doesn t show us that the process is broken and it ties into how the funding for harvey and a debt ceiling and all these other things get wrapped into these big ominous bills that nobody reads and nobody s sure of and both political parties make a lot of money off of any reckon people have to expect more. not less. the president promised he would revisit if congress doesn t act, so that s a good backstop, but we shouldn t have businesses or immigrants or their families having that kind of uncertainty, that s not right. jon: both parties are responsible for the immigration mess we find ourselves in right now.
words as possible. but when it comes to solving problems that drive right leaning americans nuts, will offers little. columns in the past three years and found no proposed solutions to the immigration mess or to the isis terror threat. in that, george will is not alone. republican establishment in washington has not dealt effectively with these and other vexing problems causing great anger among some g.o.p. voters. thus, trump s hard line rhetoric on illegal immigration and jihad has taken root. on the democratic side, things are even worse. since president obama took office in 2008, the party has moved sharply left. in fact, it is almost impossible to be moderate democrat anymore with your party supporting anarchy by supporting sanctuary cities and failing to confront isis in a ways that would crush the savages. why president obama and the establishment seek to contain the jihadiist mass murderers, intelligent
words as possible. but when it comes to solving problems that drive right leaning americans nuts, will offers little. factor has anndp his columns in the past three years and found no proposed solutions to the immigration mess or to the isis terror threat. in that, george will is not alone. republican establishment in washington has not dealt effectively with these and other vexing problems causing great anger among some g.o.p. voters. thus, trump s hard line rhetoric on illegal immigration and jihad has taken root. on the democratic side things are even worse. since president obama took office in 2008 the party has moved sharply left. in fact, it is almost impossible to be moderate democrat anymore with your party supporting anarchy by supporting sanctuary cities and failing to confront isis in a ways that would crush the savages. why president obama and the establishment seek to contain the jihadiist mass murderers, intelligent