it depends on different electorates. sometimes, is we have seen, there s a backlash to that. there s an idea of, well, no, we get a say. and sometimes it can take on its own momentum. i remember particularly in 2004 that once carry started winning it all went very quickly. it was like, okay, this is the guy, and the sort, of let s begun done with, this let s go after george w. bush. you saw this in 2020, we are because of covid, but tell me about how the sense of inevitability can work in both directions. it s fascinating, chris, because all those races are different. i think one of the reasons we lost new hampshire was voters there were saying, wait, we re going to basically give the nomination this easily to this newcomer, barack obama? they wanted us to run the gauntlet. trans different because he was president, he s got depopulate already, but one question would be, if haley beats him in new hampshire, trump is always at his worst when he thinks people thinks he s a loser. in tha
you develop a really strong case. and what donald trump has wielded so far, both when i was in the special counsel mueller investigation, and even now, is this idea of, don t worry, i have your back. i can pardon anyone like mark roger stone, michael flynn. but here for state charges, he does not have that ability. it will be interested to see who else if, anyone is charged, and what and you alluded to the idea that that was a fortification your team could not have under mueller? when we couldn t charge the president under doj policy. but we had to deal with the dangling of pardons because we were not dealing with federal cases. and not only did we have the dangling of pardons, we have the actual bestowing of pardons. and almost every single person in our investigation who didn t cooperate. there were those people who cooperated, but did not get pardons. and there is people who, you know, essentially were tough,
administration has partly it is because the joe biden administration has wanted - partly it is because the joe biden administration has wanted to - partly it is because the joe biden - administration has wanted to manage migration administration has wanted to manage migration and administration has wanted to manage migration and create administration has wanted to manage migration and create pathways - administration has wanted to manage migration and create pathways to - administration has wanted to manage migration and create pathways to the| migration and create pathways to the united migration and create pathways to the united states migration and create pathways to the united states. also limit migration and create pathways to the united states. also limit access - migration and create pathways to the united states. also limit access to i united states. also limit access to a summa united states. also limit access to a summa but united states. also limit access to
other checks, and those people who don t get those checks and late to sending out other checks that they owe. that does have a ripple effect. i think what is really interesting is this idea of just how hazy of a deadline june 1st actually is. the u.s. government is receiving money every day. they are also sending out money every single day. and on top of that, the june 1st early june deadline is when some big big bills are due when it comes to paying the military, veterans, senior social security checks, et cetera. on june 15th, and i think this is the silver lining, on june 15th, the u.s. government is expecting billions of dollars in coming in revenue from corporate tax receipts they come every quarter. so that s what they re expecting. so there s this idea of, can they finagle it somehow to sort of move money around to somehow stretch it does she have tricks up her sleeve? it s hard to tell at this
a restaurant became an illegal operation and they were able to just do that.so does so, i mean, doan does anybody on property? i mean, even without the wholewu idea of, like, you still have to pay property taxes, own you re not really on your a bloperty, blah, blah, blah. buaht after living through thatm i don t think anything could shock me in terms of what that they might do. yeah, and i think thisese is the the problem we ve got to get rid of these ceos, nicole . i mean, is that i don t wantu to put words in your mouth. do you agree with me on this? and honestly, if i were the ceo of a company being sued by the us islands for benefiting and partaking in the trafficking of minors with jeff epstein, maybe i would sayin m something bombastiinc to the fa. that i m going to be deposed i n some the next month and maybe tryof and take some of that heat off of it. but exactly what michael was saying, you cannot talk about climate change. first of all, you want to take property. start wi