it feels now like there s been this kind of inflection point and people are seeing the real boris and he does not have answers and the country has problems and he s not solving them, so whether or not he survives, i don t think. it s dangerous to get a crystal ball out, but i will say i think it s 58 seats in that red wall, when he won that massive majority in 2019, about 80 seats, 58 of those seats were labour seats that went tory, because he was so charismatic and becausejeremy corbyn was such a catastrophically unappealing labour leader. those seats now are up for grabs. there is zero assumption and zero assurance that they will stay tory. if they go back, the ability to hold power is very much in peril and you have got to think that there are a lot of people in his caucus who really like power and will do anything to hold onto it, including dump him. so how perilous is it?
i wouldn t dream of criticising the police going about their duties. i think one of the great principles of british constitutional life is that nobody is above the law. and that creates a very good constitutional setup, a good polity where corruption doesn t exist in this country as it does in some other countries because of this proper relationship between the various different parts of our system. and, therefore, i don t think, as a member of the cabinet, i would be at all right to question what the police has done. but you will be aware that there are people who do question the police, and they think there is something funny about this, there is something rather convenient for the prime minister, there must be, some say, some sort of establishment cover up or conspiracy. look, people outside government are of course entitled to raise questions about the police, and that is part of a vibrant democracy, it is part of freedom of speech. i would say it would be a very eccentric conspira
does in some other countries because of this proper relationship between the various different parts of our system. and, therefore, i don t think, as a member of the cabinet, i would be a tool right to question what the police has done. but you will be aware that there are people who do question the police, and they think there is something funny about this. there is something rather convenient for the prime minister. there must be, some say, some sort of establishment cover up or conspiracy. look, people outside government are of course entitled to raise questions about the police, and that is part of a vibrant look, people outside government are of course entitled to raise questions about the police, and that is part of a vibrant democracy, it is part of freedom of speech. i would say it would be a very eccentric conspiracy theorist who thought that the prime minister being investigated by the police was beneficial to the prime minister,
chairman saying ivanka trump should appear through invitation. that s an invitation, not a subpoena. more on that ahead. the thin red line after president biden s comments about russia and ukraine. this is a special edition of andrea mitchell reports. we are live in geneva, switzerland, only on msnbc. switzerland, only on msnbc the journey is why they ride. when the road is all you need, there is no destination. uh, i-i m actually just going to get an iced coffee. well, she may have a destination this one time, but usually no, i-i usually have a destination. yeah, but most of the time, her destination is freedom. nope, just the coffee shop. announcer: no matter why you ride, progressive has you covered with protection starting at $79 a year. voiceover: cause she s a biker. please don t follow me in. things you start when you re 45. voiceover: cause she s a biker. coaching. new workouts. and screening for colon cancer.
the united states congress on the grounds of executive privilege that donald trump, in theory, might exert. so the fact that the court has gone out of its way to say, you know what? even if he was president, this would not be withheld from the public and the reason is, bianna, because we re talking about a bloody insurrection at the capitol and all americans need to get to the bottom of what went on here, and i think the walls are closing in, frankly, on donald trump and the people in the white house and frankly in the congress that were working together, apparently, to take a valid election away from the american people. very serious stuff. yeah, and as we mentioned, the committee is already getting its hands on some of these documents as we speak. what exactly could they be learning from these documents? what would these documents reveal that they don t already know? it s important to keep in mind, of course, if there was nothing to hide in the documents, i don t think donald tru