we wa nt we want to stop talking about immigration, we know it s one of your top priorities and we know from documents of the bbc saw this week that when your chance for you expressed doubts about number ten s desire to spend migrants send migrants to rwanda. are you upset on revelations? ida. migrants to rwanda. are you upset on revelations? ., migrants to rwanda. are you upset on revelations? revelations? no, i have not fully documents revelations? no, i have not fully documents i revelations? no, i have not fully documents i cannot revelations? no, i have not fully documents i cannot comment i revelations? no, i have not fullyl documents i cannot comment but revelations? no, i have not fully. documents i cannot comment but i ultimately documents i cannot comment but i ultimately helped fund that scheme and my ultimately helped fund that scheme and myjob now is to get it up and running and myjob now is to get it up and running because it is about deterrence. the nationa
because we will have somewhere else to send you because we will have somewhere else to send you and that is the deterrence i think is so important in the deterrence i think is so important in the national crime agency agrees on that in the national crime agency agrees on that i in the national crime agency agrees on that i am so keen to get the scheme on that i am so keen to get the scheme up on that i am so keen to get the scheme up and running. people will disagree. scheme up and running. people will disagree, the labour party disagrees with that disagree, the labour party disagrees with that principle by the way about having with that principle by the way about having a with that principle by the way about having a deterrence and workable deterrence agreement but my view is you cannot deterrence agreement but my view is you cannot solve this problem without you cannot solve this problem without having a proper deterrent and that without having a proper deterr
like you to address this. court stopped our ability to remove people once we have been through our process of parliament and our court system. i have been crystal clear about that. does that mean ignoring a rule 39? forgive me, you have said you will do whatever it takes, you will not let a foreign court to stop it happening, the practical way in which that could happen would be a rule 39, would you ever ignore a rule39? ., , ., , ,, , ., and then, i am entirely confident what we are doing is entirely complied with international obligations. i have been crystal clear, i will not let a foreign court blocked our ability to remove people safely to rwanda. you will. not answer the question. i have been very clear. when it comes to the specifics of how we do this, first, we have to get the bill through parliament and i am sure when keir starmer is here next week i am sure he will ask him, why are you not supportive of a workable deterrent like rwanda? we will make sure we can safely remov
would not work. do you deny that? again, i ve not seen these documents i cannot again, i ve not seen these documents i cannot comment on them. do again, i ve not seen these documents i cannot comment on them. . .- i cannot comment on them. do you den ou i cannot comment on them. do you deny you have i cannot comment on them. do you deny you have doubts? i cannot comment on them. do you deny you have doubts? about - i cannot comment on them. do you | deny you have doubts? about sending people to africa. the deny you have doubts? about sending peeple to africa- people to africa. the proof is in my actions, i obviously people to africa. the proof is in my actions, i obviously believe - actions, i obviously believe deterrence work because when i became deterrence work because when i became prime minister i prioritise getting became prime minister i prioritise getting a became prime minister i prioritise getting a scheme up and running with albania getting a scheme up and ru
which quite too happy to talk about that which was quite too happy to talk about that which was interesting. let s quite too happy to talk about that which was interesting. quite too happy to talk about that which was interesting. let s have a listen. which was interesting. let s have a listen- anybody which was interesting. let s have a listen. anybody who which was interesting. let s have a listen. anybody who is which was interesting. let s have a listen. anybody who is serious - which was interesting. let s have a i listen. anybody who is serious about eating listen. anybody who is serious about eating our listen. anybody who is serious about eating our country listen. anybody who is serious about eating our country would listen. anybody who is serious about eating our country would not - listen. anybody who is serious about eating our country would not enter. listen. anybody who is serious about eating our country would not enter a| eating our country would not