emissions by 18%. we reduced our emissions faster than european countries that are criticizing donald trump. our emissions are at 1992 leveled and not because of a treaty or parchment signed in paris or kyoto but the free market economy, innovation and technology. hydraulic fracking, clean coal technologies that are reducing our emissions, that will continue regardless of the paris agreement. we did it while keeping our energy prices half of those in europe. we kept our energy prices half of the european average, one third of germany which is increasing its emissions, we are doing better than all these people criticizing donald trump to dance will continue regardless of this treaty. heather: donald trump signing a waiver keeping the us embassy open and tel aviv for now. this delay to jerusalem in hopes it could create peace talks
administration when george w. bush withdrew from the treaty on global warming. this is groundhog day. i m experiencing all the same outrage and predictions of apocalypse and the world is coming to the end and the rest of it do you know what happened when george w. bush pulled out of the kato treaty, next four years we reduced our emissions by 18%. faster than the european countries criticizing donald trump. our emotions right now are at 1992 levels. it s not because of a treaty or parchment signed in cyoto. economy, invention and technology. hydraulic fracking and coal technologies reducing our emissions. that is going to continue because of this paris agreement. by the way, we did it while keeping our energy prices half of those in europe. pete: free market state based solutions. brian: heritage foundation going to cost 400,000 jobs.
yes, sir. this gentleman right here. this gentleman right here. yes. thank you. isn t it of concern that the united states has broken a promise to 190 countries and the president did not address that particular point? and, second, you ve several times raised that the lowering of co2 levels, isn t the reason because of blocking the smoke stack spews that are not allowed the kind of regulations that the administration is now opposing? as i indicated, largely, we have reduced our co2 footprint through innovation and technology and not the least of which is the hydraulic fracking. how does that help our credibility? truly, if it s a promise enforceable and going to obligate this country, then it should have been ratified as a treaty. right? the exposure here to us domestically was 26 to 28% targets that were part of an international agreement and there are provisions in the
a question mark bill: he ll get a lot of criticism he was good and criticism for this when he was in europe. he was being protest on these grounds by the europeans. the right decision is to pull out and not to try he ll be criticized either way. he should be clean and make it clear that this is a work of fiction, that these goals are fictional. the chinese promised to deliver by the year 2030 is the same as if they did nothing. what he should point to instead is what the united states has done, not by signing an accord. hydraulic fracking has reduced
we are in the process of that technological resolution revol. she declared an end to the war on coal and fossil fuels. we have been blessed with a nation with natural gas. and the rest. that we use all forms of energy to generate electricity, so we can grow our manufacturing base, giving consumers the option with respect to fuel efficiency and choosing vehicles that are run on natural gas. a renewed focus. hydraulic fracking, making sure we take advantage of natural gas but also the last administration picked winners and losers. sean: how many millions of jobs will be created if we go with this all the above strategy, energy is the lifeblood of any economy. how many years would it take america to become fully energy independent and how many jobs