when you go back and look at t.a.r.p., which we got from a republican president and continued by a democratic president, donald trump would not be for that. that benefits all these big banks who didn t need the help. in some cases were forced to take the money. that was 2007-2008 legislation. but who is to say from eight years ago. right. you guys always want to talk about the iraq war, which was five years before that. right but he is going to simulate energy investment. is goldman sachs does goldman sachs it s a big place. don t make this an overwrought question and answer, but does goldman sachs want the kind of energy independence that donald trump wants so we stop relying upon foreign sources of oil and unleashing energy off our shores and under our feet right here in the u.s., spur economic growth within our communities, do the hydraulic fracking that is unleashing the natural gas we have right here? i don t know.
trump wants so we stop relying upon foreign sources of oil and unleashing energy off our shores and under our feet right here in the u.s., spur economic growth within our communities, do the hydraulic fracking that is unleashing the natural gas we have right here? i don t know. there are many different there you go. there s an answer. in other words, let s ask them. it s a tool of the big banks that gave i ll tell you one more thing he would do. he wouldn t take gazillions of dollars in speaking fees for big banks and pretend somehow he s going to regulate them or somehow he s going to be for the people. if hillary clinton were we have no idea what he has taken in speaking fees. he has given speeches for money. but we have no idea how much money because he refuses to release his tax returns. hillary clinton, as cnn has reported, she has made tens of millions of dollars on speeches and she gives them for free now and nobody seems to want to show up and listen to them. her
the procedure is a procedure. they relate to the procedure. costs more in energy to produce fracturing, and produce you re paying less for gas. contribute to solar and wind what do you think of that? her numbers are 100% incorrect. we re the richest nation in the world in energy because of shell gas. there s nothing wrong with having standardized regulations to make sure that the public has confidence and they re cot worried what we are doing to bring them inexpensive energy the most in the world. both of you the argument for the new regs it has formalized what everyone should know, but, man, a lot of pages to read. did you read them yet? i diid. i read them didn t understand them. there s no problem in the long run. we ll be fine with an extra set of regulations. they won t put us out of business, and maybe new york will now drop their ban on hydraulic fracking
e trade gives you the tools and resources to get it right. are you type e ? now to our deep dive. new technology like hydraulic fracking, is sparking a big shift in oil and energy production worldwide. many taught that freedom from the shackles of foreign oil could be within reach. but do the risks outweigh the rewards? fracking didn t become widely used until the past decade and involves pumping chemically treated water to rock. that hasn t stopped investors and drill operators from pushing ahead. after fracking became
state of texas. it s an antiregulation republican led state with pretty much the mind set of you can drill it, do whatever you want with it. the state also has a massive surplus and a small oil extraction tax, which is added up over the years. north dakota state budget director estimates the general funds surplus will be at $457 million when the two-year budget cycle ends on june 30th of next year. now, what are the by products of all the drilling the several dozens tons of what s known as nets. filter socks. now, these socks are being just thrown away every day. the socks basically are used to capture the solids in waste water used in hydraulic fracking. the socks are a notorious source of radio active material. they concentrate naturally,