wipers to protect our new glass that service on our time safely repair safe, like replace will live forever. no it s literally never crossed my mind. if we live to like 135 years of being retired, i don t want to outlive our money. and i ve been eating all these stupid chia seeds could totally live to be 100 thinking some good care of myself since we started working with him power were able to get all our financial questions answered. so we don t have to worry. so you never never 17 million people and take control of your financial future to empower what s next start today to empower .com. tonight s stormy daniels is speaking out for the first time since trump pleaded not guilty to charges stemming from a hush money payments hush money scheme to cover up their alleged affair in the days leading up to the 2016 election. when word of it became public, the adult film star now telling piers morgan, she would quote absolutely testify and potential trial if she was asked to saying, quote. it
for joining us, so you clearly dealt with similar facts here right? a hush money payments scheme to benefit a political campaign, so i m curious. what are your thoughts about the trump indictment in this case that alvin bragg has laid out so far. yeah thank you. pamela appreciate the opportunity to chat about this. i think the key difference that i see in this one is that it feels a little bit more political than it did back in the john edwards case, and i know there were politics involved, but at the time it felt you didn t feel the same circus kind of feeling as you do today. and tell me a little bit more about that. why do you think it feels more political? i know that you re talking about the circus. but is it because the d a is was a democrat? he was elected. what makes it feel that way to you? i think that s one of the things certainly the fact that the d, a kind of came
right? a hush money payments scheme to benefit a political campaigns and i m curious. what are your thoughts about the trump indictment in this case that alvin bragg has laid out so far. yeah thank you. pamela appreciate the opportunity to chat about this. i think the key difference that i see in this one is that it feels a little bit more political than it did back in the john edwards case, and i know there were politics involved, but at the time it felt you didn t feel the same circus kind of feeling as you do today. and tell me a little bit more about that. why do you think it feels more political? i know that you re talking about the circus. but is it because the d a is was a democrat? he was elected. what makes it feel that way to you? i think that s one of the things certainly the fact that the d, a kind of came out with one attitude and then went and changed to another attitude. i felt the same way
from august 2015 to december 2017 the defendant, i m quoting that, obviously, is donald trump orchestrated a scheme with others. the defense the indictment reads to influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress its publication and to benefit the defendant s electoral prospects. now according to the statement of facts, which accompanies this actual indictment, which they go through through here, $130,000 were paid to adult film star stormy daniels $30,000 to a doorman and $150,000 to another woman, which it is clear from the statement of facts is karen macdougal. it is an unprecedented chapter in american history. and good afternoon to all. i m erin burnett here in new york, and i m wolf blitzer here in washington. the lead up to trump s arrest was truly a remarkable sight to see the former president of the united states, leaving trump tower early this afternoon. his 11 car
the counselor always fairly bare bones, but it s the preparatory leg preparatory language that is used before the counts that out that outlines the scheme that the prosecution is making public to educate the public, presumably on the background of the facts that relate then to the substantive counts. alright. so in in that section as this goes through alvin bragg lays out those. so what did you find there? that was new or that that surprised you these details here. well i m not really surprised. i think it was an indictment. that was not bare bones. i m just saying, in contrast to some of the comments in your prior panelists bones indictments before and they can be very bare bones. this is not a bare bones indictment. all right. so let me try to understand maybe a different way. if i ask this, alvin bragg said he got additional evidence in this case, and he said that in the press conference, so from reading the indictment, and you obviously were very familiar