represented the scoundrel laura: i never understood the people who thought that trump should testify. if you have an objective group of people you can persuade, of course you consider testifying. but if you have people like him laura: he s gone, though. they never unravelled the taint that he created. nor do we know about the texts of the people who are there right now. what did they write about donald trump do. they think i m a deplorable and the 80 million people who voted for him. laura: we have more to get to. peter strzok s testimony comes 48 hours after john soloman drops the news of an fbi scandal. rudy will react, next.
she went to dartmouth and they made a lot of trouble and noise when they were there. just saying. laura: not me. a great show. sean: wait a minute, i read about one other offense. remember, it was forgot it. laura: i have a whole hour to fill with stories about you. you better go to the pub now, hannity. sean: i m going to the last pub open. laura: you have a great rest of the morning. i m laura ingraham. this is the ingraham angle. bombshell from peter strzok. we ll have analysis of the raucous hearing from a top lawmaker, rudy giuliani and more. and a bombshell from john soloman that the fbi may have received multiple versions of the russian dossier. mr. soloman will be here to explain. and across the pond, president
clinton and the fbi kept signing for the packages. that s chilling. isn t that called collusion? or conspiracy to gin up a totally inappropriate, totally illegal wire? based on national security? and doesn t it with no investigation, doesn t it taint the entire russian probe? how much of that information from that wire ended up being in the russian probe? how much is presently infecting it and why doesn t manafort lawyers move to dismiss for taint. there will never be an indictment of the president. but we want to investigate that in the counter report we are write to whatever kind of hatchet job might be done on the president which i hope doesn t happen. laura: this is one of the best parts of the hearing. let s watch. the fbi got documents from bruce orr?
that i cannot disagree with more. i and men and women of the fbi every day take our personal beliefs and set those aside in vigorous pursuit of the truth wherever it lies and whatever it is. laura: the men and women in the fbi who run high profile investigations do they carry on a running commentary via text message about the tujt of their investigation and what they hope happens to the key players therein? i don t think so. and i hope not. but that is precisely what strzok did. now there, is no doubt, of course, as we repeated over and over again. fbi agents are entitled to their own political opinions and have them but it s the blatant biases revealed in the texts and the specificity therein are troubling and they remain so. he claims to take great offense and he was sitting up very straight and looking down his
trump is in england tonight and we ll have footage of what the british folks really think about this president. and michelle malkin joins us about an interview that president trump gave to a uk newspaper. but first when a trump hating fbi investigator struck out. that s the focus of tonight s angle. barnum & bailey would have been proud. there may not have been elephants or jugglers or trapeze artists flying through the air. but for hours and hours and hours today, former fbi investigator peter strzok was walking a tight rope that republicans desperately tried to knock him off of. you re asking us to believe when you say tv trump and stop trump and impeach trump those are personal beliefs and when you say those things, you never crossed that line?