unleashes a new offensive against donald trump, calling him out as a convicted felon after losing in 2020. then the president moves to crackdown on illegal immigration, issuing new restrictions on migrants seeking asylum. plus, will a.i. up in presidential elections? new fears as the 11th hour gets underway on this tuesday night. good evening once again. i am stephanie ruhle, live from rockefeller center. we are now 154 days away from the election and president biden is sharply escalating his attacks on donald trump. so far joe biden has maintained radio silence on trumps multiple indictments and there have been reports of divisions within his campaign over whether he should publicly discuss trumps legal woes. after last week s legal verdict the president has clearly made up his mind. during a fundraiser last night, president biden called trump unhinged, blasting him as a convicted felon who snapped after he lost the election. he is not alone in taking an aggressive turn with
donald trump, carrying a criminal connection. he launches attacks and calls on the supreme court to cancel his guilty verdict. a jury is seated for the federal trial of hunter biden. opening statements are hours away. bankrolling election deniers. the companies backing lawmakers that pushed the big lie as the 11th hour gets underway on this monday night. good evening, live from 30 bok center, we are 155 days from the election. americans have had a few days to face reality that one of the major candidates is now a convicted criminal. 50% of all americans think the verdict was correct compared to 27% that think it was wrong. that is according to a new poll. 49% think he should now and his campaign. when you look at independence, percent of people that believe the verdict was correct goes up to 52% donald trump continues leading the republican party in a revolt against the conviction while attacking the entire justice system. he is openly asking the supreme court to interv
hunter biden s gun charges trial got underway this morning. we also heard from the first witness as the prosecution put an agent on the stand to testify. reporter: tonight the prosecution kicking off their case against the son of the president with one simple message to the jury, no one is above the law. in opening arguments the prosecutor saying hunter biden was a user of crack and a drug addict. he chose to lie on a government form about his drug use when he purchased a 38 caliber handgun. no one is allowed to lie on a federal form like that, even hunter biden he said. pointing to the defendant s own words in his own voice. mainly however we just planted ourselves on the couch and smoked a ton of crack. reporter: playing these audio clips from hunter biden s memoirs to the jury. the ability to find crack in
donald trump, carrying a criminal connection. he launches attacks and calls on the supreme court to cancel his guilty verdict. a jury is seated for the federal trial of hunter biden. opening statements are hours away. bankrolling election deniers. the companies backing lawmakers that pushed the big lie as the 11th hour gets underway on this monday night. good evening, live from 30 bok center, we are 155 days from the election. americans have had a few days to face reality that one of the major candidates is now a convicted criminal. 50% of all americans think the verdict was correct compared to 27% that think it was wrong. that is according to a new
violent. if there has been any political prosecution compared to manhattan, it is this one. this sounds incredibly naove. given what charles laid out, it is a trump appointed prosecutor. president biden allowed this to happen. shouldn t this put in and to the argument that trump and allies are pushing the president biden has his thumb on the justice system. if it was, he would not allow his only living son to be sitting for the trial. shouldn t this in theory and the argument? or even when the justice department prosecuted menendez. a democrat in congress and in senate. there are so many examples of this justice department, making objective decisions all the way through. frankly, in the chump cases, the evidence is so overwhelming it would be egregious not to