Resiliency, and i must say the land use had the greatest dialogue, and we came back together as a working group not long ago, a month or two ago, and it appeared that, from my perspective that the we needed to elevate the conversation across the three sub committees and try to bring it out of the silo and try to integrate all of the work that weve been doing, and so weve been very vocal as tryit tryin continue that conversation. Were in phase two or part two or whatever part two, and its going to go into part three which is a long Public Outreach and Engagement Process that will then evolve into what the document will ultimately get published as. Not only does it need to be aspirationial, but it needs to be holistic, and thats what weve been trying to interject into this whole process, and the waterfront and the port is a whole cultural legacy of our city, and the individual pieces of it that are identified as historic elements are just a piece, just smaller elements of that, and weve
To comply. I dont see the reason to requis unless there is a reason, whicht been set forth in any of the dos ive read, why would the cannabs business or this new industry be burdened by this requirement onm the getgo they may not be ableo qualify. Were creating a business that t qualify or maintain the legalits existence by not being able to d employees. It is counter it does not sem logical to me and would like ths commission to inquire with the y attorney as to its enforceabili, enforceability of this provisio. And im completely surprised ths been maintained at this high le. Yes. I mean you can construct all kif easy. Mental arguments against this. Imagine a business with 12 empld six live in the city and six lif city. One of the six who lives in they decides to move out of the city. Do i have to fire somebody and a local hire in order to stay in compliance . Now am i going to deprive my eme who has a right to move, deprivf the employment because of the requirement the city has put o
That that rfq does come empowere chair to work with council and Administrative Officer to scopee the person identified for the r. Thank you. Do we have a second . Okay. I think so this is moved by i have to do we have to approve amendment . Or can we have that as one moti . Clerk the motion hadnt beee yet, so she was adding to it. Supervisor fewer is commissr pollock making that motion or m . Clerk should be one or the. Im happy to make the motione an rfq and empower the chair tok with the Legal Council and exece officer to create a process andn individual for the position. Supervisor fewer thank you. Moved by commissioner ronen secy commissioner pollock without ob. The commission authorizes the cr to this motion passes. Madam clerk, please call item 7. Clerk Public Comment. Supervisor fewer are there y members of the public that woulo speak . Seeing none, Public Comment is. Id like to thank everyone and u all happy mol days. Clerk we have item 8. Item 8 is future agenda items. Supervi
Well, as mr. Neil pointed out the least Public Opinion poll on what youre selling here today only 27 of the American People want it. So i dont know which people youre talking but but the people of this country dont want this particular bill. They love tax reform thats fair, thats geared more toward middle income americans, that they believe will actually result in economic growth, but they dont whatnot what youre selling they dont want what youre selling but a 2009 Say Something here because mr. Cross mr. Woodl talked about the glorious process. I mean, this process is terrible. No matter how you want to look at it. Quite frankly, getting up here and saying your proud of this process, thats offensive. Thats offensive to us. I think its offensive to the American People. Thats review. Lets review the process. To start they have zero let me repeat zero hearings on. The bill was jammed through the ways and Means Committee where every single democratic amendment was blocked and member s had
When you say that all of the activity that took place on mr. Ross agreed with you that you all had task forces and you worked late into the night, after all of that, why then when you took the majority did you all not pass a healthcare measure . I just am curious. I ask you that, dr. Burgess, and i know you tried and i know the former health and Human Services director tried, but you all had the benefit of the majority and you didnt pass a healthcare measure. You spent time trying to repeal the existing healthcare measure, the Affordable Care act. I yield the gentleman will recall the white house was not of a mind to accept anything that republicans were going offer and you remember those discussions. You remember we are were working with the senate that was controlled by democrats and mr. Harry harry reid was the may and werent of a mind to we did pass a reconciliation nil december of 2015, and that reconciliation bill subsequently vetoed by president obama became the Health Care Bill