Different they could be hit with some kind of a fire. That happened to google. They said they were not they were honoring thirdparty cookies that were in fact hacking around with russia racked this. The fcc affirmative laid out under the fact that the communications of book cover them as communications as common carriers, they have to make rules. The ftc never had rules that they didnt have rulemaking authority. Host before we go any further, gentlemen, lets bring Howard Buskirk in. Hes the executive director communications. Guest i want to ask you first of all, what are you concerned for the isps in terms of where the fcc may be headed in terms of this area . I have counseled clients in different areas. If one were to apply with the privacy rules, which were developed in the context of the Telecom Reform act of 1996, which the rules really do not work very well in a world of the internet where you have apps and you have Internet Advertising Company and operating systems, all these dif
Then they could be retroactively hit with some kind of a fine or Something Like that. That happened to google, 22. 5 million. They said they were not they were honoring blocking Third Party Cookies but were, in fact, hacking around them. It was retroactive. The fcc affirmatively now, under the fact that the Communications Law will cover them as communications as common carriers, they have to make rules. I mean, the ftc never had rules. They didnt have any rulemaking authority. Its all been about host well, before we go any further here, gentlemen, lets bring Howard Buskirk into the conversation, executive Senior Editor of communications daily. What are the concerns of the ispns, what would be your biggest concern . Guest well, and im not here representing any particular isp. I have done a lot of work counseling clients in many different areas, including some isp clients. But i think the concern is if one were to apply the current telecommunication cans privacy rules Telecommunications
Peter jim halpert, do you support this rulemaking process, a, and what should be in it . Jim i agree with john that theres confusion right now as to what privacy rules apply and it makes sense for the f. C. C. To move forward and describe what rules its going to apply in greater detail. In terms of what should be in that rule, i think thats really the key question, which well be discussing today. There is considerable disagreement. One can take the view that the internet ecosystem is one whole entity, that i. S. P. s are a particular player in that. But fundamentally in the world of internet advertising, for example, i. S. P. s are a very small player in that market right now. And there ought to be one set of rules, if a consumer has an apple iphone, they dont expect a different set of rules to apply to the Internet Connection that they receive than would apply to the operating system that sees all the traffic going across that phone or any of the apps on the phone. So theres an argume
The 21st century is made for us if we do what needs to be done. That is why i am running for president , because i want this generation to do its part. America is a special country and i know this personally because of my parents in 1956, had they stayed to cuba stayed in cuba, i may never have been born. You have to be very optimistic about the future to have two kids in your 40s. [laughter] [applause] senator rubio more importantly, even if i had been born, if they had gone to any other nation on earth, there is no way i am standing on a stage in front of my fellow citizens, aspiring for the highest office in the land. In a most every society that is ever existed, success depends where you come from. Ona most every society earth, your future is largely determined for you on the day you were born. If your parents are wealthy or powerful, you will probably be wealthy and powerful. If they are not, no matter how hard you work or how good you are, you are usually stock in that station in
Governor pat mccrory escalate the nations clash about transgender rights and sued the Justice Department which said last week the state had violated the Civil Rights Act of 1954 went passed a law that prohibited people from using Public Restrooms that do not correspond to the gender listed on the birth certificate. The government accused the Justice Department of a radical reinterpretation of the law. They said the loss by the access provision was a bulwark against Sexual Assault but critics many of them demanded a full repeal said that section of the law effectively allowed this commission against transgender people. You can read more about those actions at nytimes. Com. Tonight on the communicators, republican fcc commissioner Michael Oreilly on several key issues facing the fcc like Net Neutrality, spectrum auctions and settop boxes. He comments on the political divide within the fcc. Is joined by Howard Buskirk. The direction from leadership including the chairman to take the most