Center on Mission Street in San Francisco and joined by carla, the Deputy Director of spur and one of the persons who pushed this shelter in place and safe enough to stay concept and we want to talk about what it means and why its important to San Francisco. As you know the bay area as 63 chance of having a major earthquake and its serious and going to impact a lot of people and particularly people in San Francisco because we live on a major fault so what does this mean for us . Part of what it means is that potentially 25 of San Franciscos building stock will be uninhibit tabl and people cant stay in their homes after an earthquake. They may have to go to shelters or leave entirely and we dont want that to happen. We want a building stock to encourage them to stay in the homes and encourage them to stay and not relocate to other locations and shelters. Thats right so that means the Housing Needs to be safe enough to stay and we have been focused in trying to define what that means and
I got it. This is the fee table that would change now it would include the 7 it will include eliminating technology surcharge. When my industry askses me were talking about 7 with the possibility of two more percent with the technology . Is that the way you would sell it . Well were talking about 7 generally, with the 2 for the technology surcharge, if you look at the tiers its going to adjusted slightly more. Do we have it at 10 . Or its difficult to say because the only place it fluctuates is the building and plan review those are the two based on evaluation the others are strictly 7 . Commissioner walker. I want to be clear, in the next few years, were going to be losing money to get rid of our fund balance, you are actually putting in a set of fees, where we actually dont cover our costs. Thats correct. Its called balancing the books, isnt this . Well, in some sorry deputy. Commissioner lee. I apologize for missing the last two meetings, i realized i could have watched the meetings
Pxxuuuxxpux like to bring up mr. Tony salazar for nearly 40 years has fought to develop and redevelop communities of color mr. Salazar clapping thank you. Ive developed developments like this all over the United States i want you to know that today, i can attest that San Francisco is showing the world had you great it is you should be proud great cities accommodate everyone didnt matter how much money or the jobs they do or the income great cities accommodate everyone this project as reverend walker said will create a village and mixed use and have people of Different Levels of working and living together unit will be i think distinguishable theyll be of high quality and Energy Efficient and treating e creating the best Community Possible people will drive by and say thats not Public Housing they wont know the difference theyll say thats the community i want to live in and great developments like this have great leadership and i want to thank several people here who have it takes a lot
Our fund balance, you are actually putting in a set of fees, where we actually dont cover our costs. Thats correct. Its called balancing the books, isnt this . Well, in some sorry deputy. Commissioner lee. I apologize for missing the last two meetings, i realized i could have watched the meetings is there discussion provided by overthecounter, versus submittal plans . I see some where in the presentation or in the package we recognize that possibly, why were getting a big surplus is because were getting efficient with the large projects a lot of projects are application submitted over the count ear counter. Is there any of that into the decision . Over study, it says we do it the cost is less. Correct. True. Do we factor that into our study . So mgt, the consultant did not factor into the study he used that one of the reasons why costs are low, but as randy had said before shg the whole purpose of that study is if you bring in 15, the idea you should spend 15. So he identified a couple
Who gets to make that decision, if we can do it . Is that a question to me . overlapping speakers . I will defer to the City Attorney on that. Please run to the hills on that. Deputy attorney marliny, burns, the board of supervisor sets the fees, and the body makeses a recommendation to the board about those fees. Im fine with that love to talk to them. That is another conversation for another day, but as a priority, we do have policy in place to get the plan check but to the fees no. Okay . Thank you very much. I would like to make a correction to the tables in front of you, if you are taking an action for voting on this. If you look at table one p apartment license fee, that is a 7 for reduction, but that is not charge for services rereduced the charge for services, that is a fee attached to the owner of the building for property bill, so we would say that we would keep it as it. What page is that on . That is actually you would have to look at item six. Its the red line of the actua