Pockets, these impressions that were the greedy landlords is wrong, were Small Business owners and were just basically trying to operate our Small Business. Reporter currently there are roughly 44,000 rent controlled units in san jose. Landlords of those units can legally raise the rent 8 a year more than enough advocates say to put the squeeze on working families. Its supposed to balance a reasonable fair return but at the same time make sure that tenants arent being subjected to unjust rents. Reporter supporters are strengthening the rent control ordinance would like to see annual increases tied to inflation or the cost of living. The council will have to wade through several competing proposals as they try to cool the redhot rental market. Reporter now, the council is going to consider a proposal that would link the annual increases in rent to the cost of living. Another that would cap it at 5 . And yet another at 6 . And those Public Comments are expected to last for several hours.
And i, walked out and shook hands and the attorney asked, would we allow him to take and run up the agreement to the board of appeals . And he turns out that we found out, 16 months later on march fifth that he never got there. And no one knew anything about it. And so in other words, the entire agreement was never delivered. The agreement is by its own terms and i have sent you and i hoped that you have looked at the paperwork because you have seen it and it has the following distinguishing features, number one, it is one document, agreement in appendix are one document in its own terms, two, it is not severable. And three it can be modified only by a subsequent agreement and four if one provision is unenforcable and other provisions remain intact. Five it was drafted by her lawyer. Six, they both demanded that it be signed by old neighbors t was going to be myself, my sister and my niece who are owners of the building next door and she refused to accept that as it and but required al
Project, sponsors attorney, and i, walked out and shook hands and the attorney asked, would we allow him to take and run up the agreement to the board of appeals . And he turns out that we found out, 16 months later on march fifth that he never got there. And no one knew anything about it. And so in other words, the entire agreement was never delivered. The agreement is by its own terms and i have sent you and i hoped that you have looked at the paperwork because you have seen it and it has the following distinguishing features, number one, it is one document, agreement in appendix are one document in its own terms, two, it is not severable. And three it can be modified only by a subsequent agreement and four if one provision is unenforcable and other provisions remain intact. Five it was drafted by her lawyer. Six, they both demanded that it be signed by old neighbors t was going to be myself, my sister and my niece who are owners of the building next door and she refused to accept th
Today, is that in our neighborhood, we have never had a case like this before. Lots of people have remodeled and improved their homes this has never been a case that we have seen. When we last met and after the issue was appealed and there was a ceqa appeal and it ended up on september 4, 2012, we assumed that everything was settled and that the project sponsor was going to go on and just build her building and things were fine. What we discovered was something different. There was an agreement that was arbitrated by farrell and they came up with an agreement that everybody felt that they could live with, at the end of the meeting of the board of supervisors, supervisor farrell, mr. Kevlin the project, sponsors attorney, and i, walked out and shook hands and the attorney asked, would we allow him to take and run up the agreement to the board of appeals . And he turns out that we found out, 16 months later on march fifth that he never got there. And no one knew anything about it. And so
This has been filed out and we request to see the document and we requested to see his work paip and hers we are requested to see the work papers of the house movers and no one wants to talk and the point is that it is over 40 feet on the north elevation. Project sponsor, you can submit a rebuttal. I will be brief i know that we have had a long day, i am going to leave his arguments about habeus to the city family, other than to reiterate once again that you have jurisdiction in my view, the City Attorney can advise you separately, we are here on this permit and any other permits that go forward they are validly issued. The issue around the height is taken on this shroded mystical thing and i want to kind of demystify, he was taken it out there with a vest on with the fellows who are doing the survey and the heavy equipment and mr. Cook came out to do the survey, his niece was there and so this is all been out in the open and there is nothing hidden it was all clear and again, while he