artillery, he needs air defense, including high mar there s things he needs now that we are putting him in position to be spring, summer, going into fall. you don t think he needs f-16s now? no, he doesn t need f-16s now. there is no basis upon which there is a rationale, according to our military, now, to provide f-16s. but you are not ruling it out? i am ruling it out for now. in many cities around the world today, there was clear support for ukraine. blue and yellow decorated buildings, while crowds took to the streets calling for russia to end its invasion. and in washington d. c. tonight, there was a candlelight vigil to honor ukraine s endurance in the face of this brutal war. with that, let s get smarter with the help of our lead off panel. william taylor joins us, the former u.s. ambassador to ukraine now the vice president of the u.s. institute for peaceful russia in europe. igor novikov, a former adviser to ukrainian president zelenskyy, and my old friend garr
few years, and this is the latest indication of that, and there doesn t seem to be very much that the voting public can do about it. i think that is something, that s the bigger issue what we should be looking at here. had will get in. as you say, kevin mccarthy wants his vote. that s purely cynical. he wants him there and will seat him, and let s see if there s some kind of ethics investigation into him. talking investigations, the house committee investigating january 6th released another new batch of interview transcripts including former white house aide cassidy hutchison s remaining testimony. according to those transcripts humpsen told the committee she saw former chief of staff mark meadows burning documents in his office fireplace about a dozen times between december of 2020 and january of 2021. politico previously reported that meadow had burned papers in his office after a meeting with a republican congressman scott perry, who was working to challenge the 2020 election
that will give you the latest ups information on delays and cancellations. the final report from the house committee investigating january 6th concludes that donald trump or anyone inciting an insurrection should be disqualified from public office but the panel released its final report on thursday which outlines a coordinated effort by trump and his allies to pressure state election officials, submit fake elect source to congress, and overturn the 20/20 boat. it also says the former president peddled false claims that the election was rigged to raise more than $250 million. let s bring in richard johnson, he is a senior professor of u.s. politics, there was a lot of taken from this report? what is the headline for you? we are still digesting it but i think the big headline is that, donald trump is squarely the protagonist in this story. this is not a story about
nightmare before christmas, snow, ice and a dangerous winter blast sweeping across the u.s.. as thousands of flights are canceled, we are live in the cnn weather center with what s coming next. plus, the january 6th committee releases its final report on the deadly attack on the u.s. capitol. laying out the case against former president, donald trump. and for the first time, vladimir putin uses the word, war, to describe his invasion of ukraine. we begin this hour in washington, where the house committee investigating january 6th has released its final report. without specifically mentioning donald trump, the panel concludes, anyone responsible for an insurrection should be
political culture in the united states, that would be a likely response from trump. i think, from the perspective of this report, you know, the house has done what it can do in the context of the partisan environment. it was an achievement to get to republicans under that committee, to cooperate. but, you are right, that the next step, really, whether or not there are steps to criminally prosecute, that is trickier. that will be more politically fraught for the justice department, and they have to tread more carefully then this house committee was able to do. the committee effectively says, you know, january 6th wouldn t have happened without donald trump. that is very difficult to prove, isn t it, in a court of law, when he wasn t actually there. that s right. and, the standard, of course,