Maryland and the district of columbia seek against the president the district committed several fundamental errands the suit i accept you to bring the microsoft two and a closer to if you can the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this power the court is powerless to correct any of those areas at this time. We have identified there is one overarching point and that is this the Supreme Court and cheney made it clear that the separation of powers of utmost taken, are of utmost importance when considering petitions involving the president of the note states. For example, the Court Appointed chief Justice Marshall to say in no case with the court be required against a private individual. And the court said the high respect do the office of the president must be considered throughout the entire proceeding. What does that imply in this case . The following. Their position is that even if the District Court aired in defeating debts refusing to dismiss the suit, even if ev
And we get it when we ask for it from other petitioners and so do other districts in the bay area. As far as the enrollment at the school, i will just say this. The number of 85 that i mentioned last night in the Curriculum Committee is 85 in district, ada, and it comes from one purposes prop 39 request for next year. They say they project 85. 46 for this year, and are projecting 102 for next year. Perhaps the difference is enrollment versus ada, but i dont think they would havena low of a percentage of ada to enrollment or maybe it is the total enrollment versus in district enrollment. I can say that is where i got the number from and that came from the prop 39 request. Thank you for addressing that. That was my next question. I also asked but i dont know if you looked it up about the boards rejection of the initial charter five years ago. I did find the minutes of the findings and i did send that to you today. There were two findings. The question was why did the board reject the ini
This courts decision will determine if the lawsuit can move forward. Oh yay or yay all people having any manner form of business before any u. S. Court of appeals Fourth Circuit for the court is now sitting god say the United States in this honorable court. With the house judiciary inaudible maryland and the district of columbia seek against the president the district committed several fundamental errands the suit i accept you to bring the microsoft two and a closer to if you can the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this power the court is powerless to correct any of those areas at this time. We have identified there is one overarching point and that is this the Supreme Court and cheney made it clear that the separation of powers of utmost taken, are of utmost importance when considering petitions involving the president of the note states. For example, the Court Appointed chief Justice Marshall to say in no case with the court be required against a private indiv
The next order of business is item two, announcements. The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on january 7th, 2020, at 1 00 p. M. At city hall room 416. Please silencer Electronic Devices during the meeting. The ringing and use of cell phones or similar sound producing devices are prohibited be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any persons responsible for the ringing of or use of a cell phone, pager or other similar sound producing electronic device. Announcement of time allotment for Public Comment, please be advised a member of the public has up to three minutes to make pertinent Public Comment on each agenda item unless the Commission Adopts a shorter period on any item. It is strongly recommended that members of the public who wish to address the commission fill out a speaker card and submit the completed card to the commission secretary. The next order of business is item three, report and actions taken at a closed session meeting. Th
And we get it when we ask for it from other petitioners and so do other districts in the bay area. As far as the enrollment at the school, i will just say this. The number of 85 that i mentioned last night in the Curriculum Committee is 85 in district, ada, and it comes from one purposes prop 39 request for next year. They say they project 85. 46 for this year, and are projecting 102 for next year. Perhaps the difference is enrollment versus ada, but i dont think they would havena low of a percentage of ada to enrollment or maybe it is the total enrollment versus in district enrollment. I can say that is where i got the number from and that came from the prop 39 request. Thank you for addressing that. That was my next question. I also asked but i dont know if you looked it up about the boards rejection of the initial charter five years ago. I did find the minutes of the findings and i did send that to you today. There were two findings. The question was why did the board reject the ini