immediately begin reviewing the requests of our homeland security experts and experts they are. also law enforcement professionals who have worked with us so closely. we want to thank border patrol, i.c.e., and all law enforcement. they have been incredible. based on operational guidance from the expert of the field, they ll put together a homeland security package for me to shortly sign into law. over the next 21 days, i expect both democrats and republicans will operate in good faith. this is an opportunity for all parties to work together for the benefit of our whole, beautiful and wonderful nation.
cement or steel. how do you define what will be the best protection for america? the sheriffs stated this. congress as well as our homeland security experts have to engage with the communities. you might need a wall as a physical structure in some areas. you might need a wall of technology in another or just a wall of border patrol boots on the ground. the wall is just a word. the president is standing up for what our homeland security experts have identified as a need. the sheriffs have said, you need to tailor to the geographic location and what the needs are. you can tell this in yuma were able to tailor it to have the best impact back in 2005 and
hole. just as democrats tomorrow, i believe, yep, tomorrow, they re taking control of the house. the reality is trump s my way or highway obsession with the wall has been, for months, nothing more than a fantasy. and a self-inflicted wound for himself and his party, the republican party. today, as john kelly s final day as white house chief of staff, and he s talking. he s told the los angeles times a lot of stuff including the other day he said that the idea of a concrete wall on the border had been rejected long ago by homeland security experts who work in the administration. so the advice to the president is it s not a good idea. from his own team. trump has absolutely no leverage, none, and many republicans are furious that he has left them in political peril for absolutely no good reason,
to be interviewed by homeland security experts. before they can be admitted to the united states, they have to be able to make a case before an immigration judge demonstrating they are refugees with reason to fear prosecution. this is our ellis island. ellis island is every port of entry in the country. these aren t illegal immigrants. they re not country, so they re not ill real. number two, the united states laws specifically allow people to apply for asylum. they re doing everything they sl types, except for classes of white immigrants. do you know what steven miller s mother, your sister, thinks about this? no. i have made it a point not to discuss politics, you know, with that branch of the family for
as has been mentioned for schools as well? look, i think these types of responses ought to be informed by law enforcement experts and homeland security experts. and they ought to be dricven by what the law enforcement experts say would be a help in this type of situation. and so i doubt very highly that any of those comments that those commentaries have been informed by law enforcement experts. the other thing i would say, alex, that is very important to understand as this investigation goes forward, the investigators and the prosecutors are going to be looking very hard at how it is that this individual came into possession of 21, as i understand it, 21 firearms including an ar-15 as you you mentioned. the so that will be a very important part of this investigation. what were the circumstances of his coming into possession of those firearms?