of sexual exploitation. the idea that she could have conceived and organised all of this herself is not plausible, they said. but in the end they decided that that did not prevent the home secretary making the decision to take away her british citizenship. shamima begum s lawyers said that this had been a lost opportunity to put into reverse a profound mistake and continuing injustice. the outcome that we face is that no british child who has been trafficked outside the uk will be protected by the british state if the home secretary invokes national security. and richard barrett, who specialised in counterterrorism at both m16 and the united nations, believes leaving women such as shamima begum in the camps creates more risk, not less. at least if she were in london
that shamima begum was recruited, transferred, and then harboured for the purposes of sexual exploitation. the idea that she could have conceived and organised all of this herself is not plausible,they said. but in the end they decided that that did not prevent the secretary from making the decision to take away her british citizenship. gareth peirce, one of ms begum s lawyers, called today s decision an extraordinaryjudgment delivered in an extraordinary way . let s take a listen. the outcome that we face is that no british child who has been trafficked outside the uk will be protected by the british state if the home secretary invokes national security. richard barrett is a un counter terrorism expert. he believes that leaving women
suspicion that shamima begum had been recruited, transferred and harboured for the purposes of sexual exploitation. they said the idea that she could have conceived and organised the trip herself was not plausible. but in the end, they decided that that did not make the home secretary s decision to take away her british citizenship unlawful. shamima begum s lawyers said the case had been a lost opportunity to put into reverse a continuing injustice. the outcome that we face is that no british child who has been trafficked outside the uk will be protected by the british state if the home secretary invokes national security. well, i was a security minister in the home office when she lost her citizenship, alongside many other people that posed a direct or a dangerous threat to this country. so i m pleased the courts have upheld our interpretation
welcome to newsday. reporting live from singapore, i m karishma vaswani. the headlines. ahead of the first anniversary of the russian invasion of ukraine, outright defiance from president putin. he tells an audience of tens of thousands in moscow that the conflict in ukraine is entirelyjustified, to protect russia s security. translation: there are battles i going on right now on our historical frontiers for our people. courageous warriors are fighting. we ll have details of the putin rally, and we ll look at the latest military cooperation between russia and china. also in newsday this hour. 11 palestinians were killed in over a hundred were injured on an
of trafficking for sexual exploitation because she was married off within days to an is fighter. in their ruling, thejudges concluded that there was a credible suspicion that shamima begum was recruited, transferred, and then harboured for the purposes of sexual exploitation. the idea that she could have conceived and organised all of this herself is not plausible, they said. but in the end they decided that that did not prevent the home secretary making the decision to take away her british citizenship. shamima begum s lawyers said that this had been a lost opportunity to put into reverse a profound mistake and continuing injustice. the outcome that we face is that no british child who has been trafficked outside the uk will be protected by the british state if the home secretary invokes national security.