to get her british citizenship back. we begin in moscow, where china s top diplomat, wang yi, has met president putin, and reaffirmed their close relationship. the trip to russia by wang yi comes just days before the first anniversary of moscow s invasion of ukraine. here s the meeting between the two. during their talks, mr putin said relations between his country and china were reaching new milestones . he also called on the chinese president xi jinping to visit. earlier, wang yi also met his russian counterpart sergei lavrov, where he said the relationship between the two countries could not be influenced by other nations. let s hear some of what wang yi had to say: translation: i look forward to reaching new agreements. our consultations on strategic security are highly effective between our two countries. they play an important role in strengthening trust and cooperation in a shifting international situation. much is being made of the seating arrangements for president
that they ve been restricted from using, in their ongoing criminal probe into these classified documents, that were seized from mar-a-lago last month. the appeals court is saying here, they are really agreeing with the justice department, saying that yes, in fact, national security could be harmed if the justice department can t continue its probe here. they set the doj has argued that the criminal investigation, and then national security investment is inextricably linked. the appeals court saying, yes, in fact, if we don t let the doj continue to use these classified documents, there will be real and significant harm on the united states and the public. notably, in this opinion as well, anderson, the 11th circuit is really faulting trump s lawyers, for not better explaining what seems to be their argument, the trump may be declassified [inaudible] his lawyers, his allies, but they ve not offered any proof in court filings or in-person. so the 11 circuit tonight criticizin
that shamima begum was recruited, transferred, and then harboured for the purposes of sexual exploitation. the idea that she could have conceived and organised all of this herself is not plausible,they said. but in the end they decided that that did not prevent the secretary from making the decision to take away her british citizenship. gareth peirce, one of ms begum s lawyers, called today s decision an extraordinaryjudgment delivered in an extraordinary way . let s take a listen. the outcome that we face is that no british child who has been trafficked outside the uk will be protected by the british state if the home secretary invokes national security. richard barrett is a un counter terrorism expert. he believes that leaving women
so, let s take a look back at what happened to shamima begum. she left the uk in february 2015 to join the so called islamic state group in syria. four years later, she was found alive at a refugee camp in northern syria, and the then home secretary, sajid javid, removed her british citizenship. today, at 23, she is living in that camp, and her challenge to the removal of her citizenship, has been dismissed by a judge. our home affairs correspondent, daniel sandford, explained more about that decision. in their ruling, thejudges concluded that there was a credible suspicion that shamima begum was recruited, transferred and then harboured for the purposes of sexual exploitation. the idea that she could have conceived and organised all of this herself is not plausible, they said. but in the end, they decided that that did not prevent the home secretary making the decision to take away her british citizenship. gareth peirce, one of ms begum s lawyers, called today s decision an extraordi
to the supreme court or you can go directly to the supreme court. i think maggie is right that trump delays, delays, delays, antitrust over litigate everything, so he might ask for the full on bank hearing, because that will delay things even more. it s not the only bad legal news the president called today. what impact, if any, or do you think would have any decision on whether or not he would run again. you mean the condition in new york? yeah, i mean look. i think you can look at this in two different ways. number one, a lot of people have talked to the former president, and don t think that his court seems to be in politics and running the campaign in the way it once was. that being, said if he doesn t run he loses a lot of attention, he loses the ability to fund-raise, and he loses potentially, if he were to run, the protections that the office before the sitting president, in terms of an investigation.