asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well,
now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well, judge judy wrote, if i the allegations made by the tru plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involvesthse argua the most mase attack against free speech init united stateed stas history. a massive win today for free speech that did not go over so well with our enlightened elithe who have taken up the cause of censorship. thwalter isaacson, a professoren and an author who has written biographies on albert einstein and henry kissinger and steve jobs, among others, said this on msnbc. now, then judge dodd to hishk decision goes too far. too i clearly feel that in the end, the decision will be refined somewhat because government hasp to have the right to have its own free speech to push back wheushey sen they see thins on social media they think are dangerous. the governmenat are danget he its own free speech to push back on things that arn h e