him. you are allowing the taliban and al-qaeda and the people that hate you and me and what we stand for and the people that we love in this country, there has to be and i think and i respect you and i love what you say all the time. there has to be some respect for the constitution and i know you fight every day for the constitution. peter judge jeanine: the issue is that the federal court convictions are many in the years since 9/11 and in the military tribunal very few and they have been subject to a lot of reversals. so michael is sullivan let me go to you. which way do we go. in do we want to be assured of a conviction that is longstanding or is it better to send a message and keep this guy under questioning for the next three and a half years like jose padilla? it doesn t have to be one versus the other. i would suggest that essentially you exhaust his enemy combatant status to get
without reading him miranda rights international the court recognizes a public safety exception. triggered when the information the suspect has is necessary to protect the public or cops from immediate danger. questions like do you is any more bombs out there or know of any other terrorist attacks or any other terrorists lying in wait. is he is going to be questioned without the miranda rights but is going to be tried in a civil court. how does attorney ann coulter feel about that? she joins my panel of bo and robert. are hi. hello. geraldo: what are you thinking? two points one is the case that discovered the public safety exception was a rape case. it wasn t a terrorist with bombs. cops stopped him and found an empty who willster and said where is the gun. the new york court said no miranda and has to be thrown out. the supreme court said no, this is silly. it wasn t nearly as extreme as this where you don t know if he is working with other people or
is legally appropriate. having put that aside i think you are wrong to think that an article three court is going to get the same justice we got in the the case of timothy mcveigh. he had the land record for crime to death penalty because liberals decided to portray him as a conservative although he was an atheist and a big pot smoker. more like bill maher than my politics. here they are defending him. they talked about how it was the older brother and calling him a boy and this network was calling him a gentleman. i don t think you will get that. right now you you have people running in a race and little children there and put the bag next to the little 8-year-old boy. his face will come up in the trial. the little kids with their legs blown off. people running the race for one reason, for people they have reasons for running. unemployment telling you left is lobbying to keep this guy from getting the death penalty.
without reading him miranda rights international the court recognizes a public sety exception. triggered when the information the suspect has is necessary to protect the public or cops from immediate danger. questions like do you is any more bombs out there o kw of any other terrorist attacks or any other terrorists lying in wait. is he is going to be questioned without the miranda rights but is going to be tried in a civil court. how does attorney ann coulter feel about that? she joins my panel of bo and robert. are hi. hello. geraldo: what are you thinking? two points one is the case that discovered the public safety exception was a rape case. it wasn t a terrorist with bombs. cops stopped him and found an empty who willster and said where is the gun. the new york court said no miranda and has to be thrown out. the supreme court said no, this is silly. it wasn t nearly as extreme as this whe y don t know if he is working with other people or
possibly can to see what cells he is connected to, are they here or abroad and then ones that is done prosecute him for the terrorist act in an article three court. he would be facing the death penalty under the circumstances. and third we have to give some thought to this notion. why wasn t the navy seals then involved? why wasn t the green berets involved in the takedown? why wasn t the battalion you you are confusing. no, i m not. with the investigation. i m talking about. judge jeanine: the issue, gentlemen, without getting. peter. do we give it over to the military? no. judge jeanine: without get into the issue whether it was seals or here or there. at the end of the day this guy is going to be tried in civilian court. will the government seek the death penalty? yes. they have to. they will. and i also think that the government yes, they should. and i hope they will seek the hree court and a iit goes into also believe that the united states attorney