Will violate. Good afternoon commissioner lisa president of the Liberty Hill Neighborhood Association again pretty much what has been said at the last couple of hearings has been said id like to reiterate the real concerns of the neighborhood since the last hearing ive heard no real residents ive come into contact it is my in fwroks the comments im not Hearing Support but serious concerns about the dead space on valencia and real concerns about more parking congestion Traffic Congestion and so forth and thats never been addressed you look at the comparison of retail people versus people saeks e assessing the medical facility that didnt tell the story regardless of transit first policy people will drive to medical appointment if you look at mtas statistic that might show the number of tickets and towed vehicles around 20th and valencia im sure youll find a tremendous increase in flagrant parking violation and the congestion of 20th and 21st street is really reaching you you know a crisi
Data the task force purposed its work on the San Francisco population currently underserved or inappropriately underserved the neighborhoods are those which data indicates are disproportionately unified with the health and disparities a high disease rate and mortality and lack of insurance or socioeconomic status the affirmation of underserved written by this Planning Department if apply to this location not people that meet the definition in group said they want to serve this group will be better served in the heart of the mission in the excelsior in bayview where people have Health Impacts they definitely do not have at 20th and van ness thank you very much much. Commissioner president fong one minute. I think weve allowed for two Public Comment open this item. Thank you, commissioner commissions im stephen a resident of lexington street and disproof of that although sutter made concessions it is still outsized for the approved project 5 years ago and feels slightly over the 75 feet
Our comments and decide whether or not to combine the two. Including the retail component. Retail is part of what were recommending whatever it brought up. Understood. Commissioner wu. Im hearing a split on the question of the standard what is put forward is staffs recommendation so i dont know if you want to look at changing the motion or have the split and could you look at the two differences of the justifications why their recommended please and so to explain two different scenarios one district 3 allows one unit in smaller escaped building lens 5 units and no cap on number of adu for larger sized building are more than 5 units and so in those cases the number of of adus are limited by factors the fact that adu needs to be within the envelope and not take away from the residential unit and the idea that is in compliance with the way the approach that the city has had towards the formulated factors controlled in the city and encourage to you know use this space more focusly not enou
Of the neighborhood since the last hearing ive heard no real residents ive come into contact it is my in fwroks the comments im not Hearing Support but serious concerns about the dead space on valencia and real concerns about more parking congestion Traffic Congestion and so forth and thats never been addressed you look at the comparison of retail people versus people saeks e assessing the medical facility that didnt tell the story regardless of transit first policy people will drive to medical appointment if you look at mtas statistic that might show the number of tickets and towed vehicles around 20th and valencia im sure youll find a tremendous increase in flagrant parking violation and the congestion of 20th and 21st street is really reaching you you know a crisis proportion you can hardly get through this is the emergency vehicles and the addition of flower stalls outside of a medical facility the neighborhood didnt want or need there i think is a real attempt to just try to sneak
For continuance item one filbert discretionary review is proposed for continuance until september 2016 item 2 Inclusionary Housing Program planning code is proposed until december 15, 2016, item 3 for case 18th street conditional use authorization is proposed july december 16th and further under our regular calendar item 14 for 854 cap street the address shown incorrectly on the agenda therefore needs to be continued the proposed date is september 29th thats. Case 2017 cu a i have no other items proposed for continuance i had one speaking for item one opening up for Public Comment on items on the continuance calendar richard. 62 filbert street the other applicant is stephanie and paul were requesting that the commission reschedule the hearing on the agenda from september 29th to a new date that works for us as well as the sponsor id like to briefly provide the context for this review the matter was originally scheduled for hearing on january 21st the 21st hearing was taken off the cale