assumed people of fairjudgment would have assumed that people of fairjudgment would have assumed that that people of fairjudgment would have assumed that that would people of fairjudgment would have assumed that that would have - people of fairjudgment would have i assumed that that would have meant civil servants, assumed that that would have meant civil servants, independent assumed that that would have meant civil servants, independent people i civil servants, independent people who work civil servants, independent people who work in civil servants, independent people who work in downing civil servants, independent people who work in downing street - civil servants, independent people| who work in downing street whose professional who work in downing street whose professionaljudgment who work in downing street whose professionaljudgment had - who work in downing street whose professionaljudgment had come i who work in downing street whosel professionaljudgment ha
refused nottingham, and a small group were refused asylum, nottingham, and a small group were refused asylum, 14 nottingham, and a small group were refused asylum, 14 people, - nottingham, and a small group were refused asylum, 14 people, so- refused asylum, 14 people, so a small refused asylum, 14 people, so a small number refused asylum, 14 people, so a small number but refused asylum, 14 people, so a small number but three - refused asylum, 14 people, so a| small number but three quarters refused asylum, 14 people, so a i small number but three quarters of the group small number but three quarters of the group had small number but three quarters of the group had a small number but three quarters of the group had a professional- the group had a professional qualification the group had a professional qualification and the group had a professional qualification and experiencel the group had a professional- qualification and experience prior to arrival. qualificati
power was a very big concern. reporter: they trusted george washington to be the first president to put the states interest before his own. but benjamin franklin warned nobody knows what sort may come afterwards. how do we rein in a president the founders knew that they had to do something to stop tire ants and despots. reporter: as hugh williamson said, he will spare no pains to keep himself in for life and will then lay a train for the succession of his children. but what would warrant impeachment? james madison worried a president might lose hi capacity, pervert his administration or even worse betray his trust to foreign powers. this is a theme that george washington hammers over and over again, no foreign influence in our early republic. reporter: and in the 18th century, impeachment was certainly more civilized than