Currently Washington Bureau chief with bank rate. Com. The National Press club is the leading organization for aurnalists is committed to free press around the world. For more information, please visit the website at press. Org. On behalf of our members worldwide, i would like to welcome our speaker and those of you in the audience today. Our head table includes guests of our speaker. Constantly, we remind people that members of the general public attend. Welcome cspan and other audiences here today. You can also follow us on twitter. After the speech concludes, we. Ill have questions and answers introduce our to table. We will begin on this and, welcoming paula, and in turn at public news and a student at georgetown university, bravely studying journalism and government. We want to note that she is working with the team members who organize todays luncheon. For all your work, bob. Onto the head table, gillian investorsreporter at business daily. Sheila is Vice President for external a
People ive known in law enforcement. But keep in mind persecutors of the performance evaluation is based on their conviction rate. The performance evaluation is based on the positive press for the office. For anybody to think that theres there is not a selective prosecution, i just think that you are really naive. On the sentencing issue i dont have a problem with people that are involved in whitecollar crimes that we punished them by making them pay restitution and pay fines, double their fines, do whatever. I dont have a problem with that. I dont think everybody has to go to prison to pay for the mistakes. Its like you get a parking violation. Im not saying the same thing for the whitecollar criminals but i can assure you there are many whitecollar criminals that were convicted for things they didnt even know that they did wrong. There was no criminal intent. That we but we put them in prison. I just think that its wrong. Your message seems to be getting some bipartisan support of th
Rigo . We go . Senior director of educationu to the talk on the burke blindness, and the nation of israel. The program we are co presented with the jewish week. Honored to host this talk because francine has been a long time Jewish Museum board member. For 30 years. We appreciate her ongoing dedication to our institution. Please visit the website to learn about other workshops taken place the season. After the talk we invite you to stay where francine will be signing books. Please join me in welcoming gary, editor and publisher of the jewish week who will introduce our speaker. [applause] thank you. Good evening before i forget, i want to ask you to turn off your cell phones. That goes for you too, golda says editor and publisher of the jewish week i am proud that the jewish week is co presenting the program along with her friends at the Jewish Museum. Im honored to be introducing the woman of the hour, francine who in addition to her other writings is deeply admired and avidly read as
Is that entire issue being determined in those proceedings . Not determined because the proceedings have been stayed. But three states have challenged that issue is what is at issue there . Will you finish describing the issue . I really didnt hear it. K 466 says a correction must be made in the same manner, end quote, as decision being corrected. Epas approval went through notice and comment and because of that k6 requires they go through notice and comment and corrections here did not go through notice and comment. Heres no disagreement between commissioners and respondants on that point. The United States tries to get out of that by saying they can use the good cause exception in rule making that sounded the administrator procedure act. That doesnt help epa at all because the requirement comes not from the administrative procedure act. The requirement from notice to use comments is from k6. It doesnt help epa rely on an exception to a statute when the statute does not impose the req
With the full dna. You are saying that california can take that dna, hold it in only look atand the john dna, but they have it in their custody, and there is a marylandecause versus king. By law, california can only look at discrete portions of identification dna. That is it, nothing else. Whats wrong with the proposal by ms. Haskell recognizing what king does restrict, to simply say go to the Supreme Court decision, it talks about a valid arrest supported by probable cause. Says we cancouncil draw the line with a judicial determination of probable cause and therefore am a free reign under the california statute. What is wrong with that line in terms of did interpreting how king applies to this case . Nothat interpretation would be consistent with king, which recognizes that the identification information am a whether it is fingerprints, photographs, or dna, informs the charging decision. Scalia role does justice how would this respond to . Udge mcewens for whatever reason, they got it