there is in exhibit a now in their case to say, there |~ , ., exhibit a now in their case to say, there |~ ,, , ,, there is in your time covering us oli it there is in your time covering us policy it is. there is in your time covering us policy it is. i there is in your time covering us policy it is, i wonder there is in your time covering us policy it is, i wonder what - there is in your time covering us policy it is, i wonder what you i there is in your time covering us. policy it is, i wonder what you and the american voter makes of policy it is, i wonder what you and the american voter makes of this. unprecedented moment in history. so much for american voters to get their heads around at this point in time. what do you think the reaction is or what s going through the minds of people sitting and watching this happen in prime time this evening? i think that almost everything in america political light get torn apart. it gets torn apart where you are either conserva
in the actual trial to explain, defend, or perhaps confess to why they aired live in many ways that led to or softened the ground for an insurrection. that is why this is a media story, but far more than a media story. the evidence has shown many knew trump was lying tatting election, but they, quote, endorsed it any way, and that word comes from murdoch himself. the reason this is in court is not because of the january 6th committee or congress or media matters, which is a fox kind of critic group. the reason is that somebody says they were legally hurt and defamed by fox, specifically one of the voting machine companies you may have heard of, dominion. today, damning new evidence as the case heats up. more emails show the internal fox news fact checking department they have one of those that is supposed to provide guardrails it fact-checked in advance and alerted some of the claims about that plaintiff, the voting machine company dominion, were just false. and then th
Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. It looks very hinky to me. Heres why i ask you about what this is about because lets say you win. Lets say the democrats win. You get the house. Probably not the senate, but you get the house. Theres a call for impeachment among progressives like yourself. Yes. Two things happen. Well, i dont think its just progressives, chris. There will be a call for impeachment from all those not heard, who are the majority in america. Okay. I give you that fact. Ill stipulate to it for the point of this argument. Okay. So everybody calls out. You dont have the votes. It doesnt happen. You galvanize support for the president , and we are torn more apart in this country. Are you worried about that outcome . No, i am not. I am believing in the american people. I believe in this country. I believe in what it was founded on. I believe in the constitution. I think that on election day, were going to show up in a huge w
also, there s electronic search functions i keep hearing lawyers talk about. what do you think? absolutely. they will be able to use key word searchs to find the relevant materials. there is no way that his defense attorneys are going to be poring over every page of the discovery. no defense attorney does that when reviewing discovery. you re looking for what are my defenses, what are the key pieces of evidence that the prosecutors will be focused on, and what evidence is there that will help my defense. also, the prosecutors are giving them roadmap. they re pointing them to not only evidence that is helpful to the prosecution, but also potentially they have an obligation to point to any evidence that is helpful to the defense, that is exculpatory. they have to turn that over. it sounds like they re producing it in an organized way so the
aileen cannon, today she took the first step of scheduling an actual trial for the former president. in a nearly two hour hearing lawyers for trump and his codefendant walt nauta faced off with lawyers from special counsel jack smith s office. the hearing was reportedly contentions as trump s team fought hard to delay the trial until after the 2024 election. the defense argued that the sheer volume of evidence in this case merited extra time. the defense pointed to the 1.1 million pages of evidence produced by smith s team including 1,445 pages of classified evidence. and they pointed to the more than three years worth of surveillance footage that has been submitted as evidence. but jack smith s team, the prosecution, countered it has already pointed trump s lawyers to the specific evidence that actually matters here. in other words, the defense doesn t really need to watch three years of security camera footage. trump s defense team also argued that trump couldn t be tried fairly whil