in relation to horizon problems. am i right in thinking the attached log is due to a transactional query? if we go to page three of the same e mail chain, at the bottom of page three. we have an e mail there from mark dinsdale, security programme manager at the post office. can we scroll up slightly? penny thomas, at fujitsu, do you recall penny thomas? yes. ., u. , fujitsu, do you recall penny thomas? yes. ., , , ., fujitsu, do you recall penny thomas? yes. ., ,, ., ., fujitsu, do you recall penny thomas? yes. ., , , ., ., ., yes. your copied into that e-mail. he sa 5, yes. your copied into that e-mail. he says. penny. yes. your copied into that e-mail. he says, penny, can yes. your copied into that e-mail. he says, penny, can we yes. your copied into that e-mail. he says, penny, can we set i yes. your copied into that e-mail. he says, penny, can we set up i yes. your copied into that e-mail. he says, penny, can we set up a i he says, penny, can we set up a process for these
be there in the inquiry room, listening to this investigator. we should reiterate, he isjust one of several investigators, stephen bradshaw, but he is being called a significant witness by this inquiry. in terms of what else we are going to be hearing about, there is going to be hearing about, there is going to be hearing about, there is going to be a very important week next week when we hear from fujitsu. to be a very important week next week when we hearfrom fujitsu. that is the company that was responsible for designing and implementing this horizon it system. there will be executives giving evidence. that will be incredibly important because, clearly, there has been a lot of questioning aboutjust how accountable is this company now for what has been going on? is there possibly. some people have been calling for financial sanctions against the company. and there have been, you know, a lot of questions about what fujitsu knew about the system. frankly, just how open, how honest some
about what they knew about the bugs, the flaws in the horizon system. next week, at the inquiry it is going to be incredibly important in terms of helping us to get a better understanding of who knew what and why this has dragged on for more than two decades. you mentioned fu itsu than two decades. you mentioned fuiitsu there- than two decades. you mentioned fujitsu there. the than two decades. you mentioned fujitsu there. the government - than two decades. you mentioned| fujitsu there. the government has been pressed about contracts with this company in light of what has happened in this scandal. what is their response been? are they taking any action to review their relationship with fujitsu? figs any action to review their relationship with fujitsu? relationship with fu itsu? as you sa , relationship with fu itsu? as you say. there h relationship with fu itsu? as you say. there relationship with fujitsu? as you say, there are contracts - relationship with fujitsu? as you say,
days, particularly in the light of this evidence from fujitsu, about exactly what the government proposes to do. but we are talking about hundreds of millions of pounds worth of contracts in several government departments. fujitsu has a very big footprint when it comes to public service delivery. just to remind you, the horizon system was first given the go ahead under tony blair s government back in 1999. that is how long this has been going on for. but we will be hearing a lot more about that next week. lets focus now more about that next week. lets focus now on more about that next week. lets focus now on the more about that next week. lets focus now on the public inquiry today. let s listen n. focus now on the public inquiry today. let s listen n. evidence from mr bradshaw today. let s listen n. evidence from mr bradshaw today, today. let s listen n. evidence from mr bradshaw today, evidence - today. let s listen n. evidence from mr bradshaw today, evidence from | today.
british history? it largest miscarriages of ustice in british history?h british history? it would appear that through british history? it would appear that through not british history? it would appear that through not being - british history? it would appear that through not being given i british history? it would appearl that through not being given any knowledge from the top downwards, if any bugs, knowledge from the top downwards, if any bugs, errors or defects were there. any bugs, errors or defects were there. it any bugs, errors or defects were there, it has not been cascaded down from fujitsu, there, it has not been cascaded down from fujitsu, the post office board, down from fujitsu, the post office board, down to from fujitsu, the post office board, down to the from fujitsu, the post office board, down to the investigations level. it is down to the investigations level. is your down to the investigations level. it is your evidence that because you did not rec