the networks destructive project continues. in fact his case, he specifically didn t want any that s not a problem. tonight, the question legal exposure for so-called news channel that shared confidential biden campaign information with the trump white house. we put, you know, a different viewpoint, if you like. i was david wallace wells in the massive problem that the partisan mania over the origins of covid-19. we re going to investigate the chinese virus. and senator may actually be republican support to increase real safety in the wake of the east palestine disaster. all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. in the wake of the bombshell revelations confirming once and for all the abject dishonesty a fox news, democrats and congress are now demanding action. today, house minority leader hakeem jeffries and senate majority leader chuck schumer penned a letter urging fox executives to protect american democracy against
christine todd whitman. welcome to the programme. we start with the latest development in the search of donald trump s mar a lago estate two weeks ago. a usjudge has ordered the release by tomorrow at noon eastern time of a redacted version of the affidavit that supported its application for a search warrant. it s a document that contains a lot of detail. in it, thejustice department had to lay out for the judge why they thought there was a probable cause for a crime and that evidence existed of that crime at the florida resort. and it s a document the us media and donald trump have both wanted unsealed. let s talk with former federal judge, nancy gertner. good to have you with us. on that latest development that they are expecting a release at noon tomorrow, your reaction? i expecting a release at noon tomorrow, your reaction? i am very surprised- tomorrow, your reaction? i am very surprised- the tomorrow, your reaction? i am very surprised. the usual tomorrow, your rea
already signed these kind of restrictions. only alabama and arkansas have bands blocked by judges. at least 23 states have introduced bills that restrict the transition relating to care. there s also been a raft of coverage, i am sure you ve seen, that the critics of the processes around gender affirming care from the protocols that are currently being used to the people that administer this care, included people with the transition, who regret what happened. those critiques functionally get run together with the beliefs of a significant number of people in the american right, particularly, who don t want trans people to exist, and trans folks rights are clearly extremely and acutely under threat. i ve got to say, part of the reason, not the only reason, law is bigotry and prejudice, but part of the reason is that a lot of people are confused about what we re talking about when we talk about gender affirming care for minors.
there is not a bill on this agenda, on any agenda coming forward that will be spared. every bill will go to that is nebraska state legislator, mckayla kavanaugh, who is grinding the only states legislator chamber to a whole as a means to stop legislation proposed by conservatives in that state that would ban gender affirming care for trans youth. this is one at the top priorities for conservative lawmakers across the country in state after state. seven governors, alabama, arkansas, arizona, mississippi, south dakota, tennessee, have already signed these kind of restrictions. only alabama and arkansas have bands blocked by judges. at least 23 states have introduced bills that restrict the transition relating to care. there s also been a raft of coverage, i am sure you ve seen, that the critics of the processes around gender affirming care from the protocols that are currently being used to the people that administer this care, included people with the transition, who
states that have bands, of course, by criminalising doctors or anybody giving by criminalising doctors or anybody giving advice on it, how to get an abortion, giving advice on it, how to get an abortion, scaring off people, but still you abortion, scaring off people, but still you will see that happen. it will he still you will see that happen. it will be women who are on the lower economic will be women who are on the lower economic scale who are going to find it more economic scale who are going to find it more difficult and very often they it more difficult and very often they may it more difficult and very often they may have already had children and can t they may have already had children and can t support another child, you are going and can t support another child, you are going to and can t support another child, you are going to see a back alley abortions which we had before roe versus abortions which we had before roe versus wade that they are going to lo