Results of the 2020 president ial election. Unlike his three previous indictments, this, time the former president will have to make a trip to jail, or he will be booked ahead of his arraignment, which is scheduled for the week of september 5th. Trump is now facing a total of 91 criminal charges in four separate cases across different jurisdictions. Yet, for criminal indictments and the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison, has not humble the former president in the least. He remains unrepentant and unapologetic for his actions, and, if anything, hes grown more defiant. Nearly three years later, he still denies the result of the 2020 president ial election, even though he hasnt offered up a shred of proof of the sort that has been able to withstand the slightest scrutiny. On top of that, he continues to attack anyone remotely connected to the cases against him, except the one judge that he appointed who will oversee the maralago documents case. Despite receiving multi
have been arguing for years now that this means that trump s actions on or around january six disqualify him from holding public office ever again. and that argument is receiving renewed attention, after william bought and michael stokes paulson, to prominent conservative law professors and members of the federalist society, announced that they have written a paper about the disqualification clause and have come to the same conclusion. that donald trump is ineligible to hold office. now, their conclusion is receiving an important boost of support in a brand new article. it was just published within the last few hours this morning in the atlantic, titled, quote, the constitution prohibits trump from ever being president again, end quote. it is written by the esteemed conservative former federal judge, jay michael luttig, and the harvard legal scholar, lawrence tribe. the article voices support for bought and polson s paper, and
even though who are staunch, staunch trump supporters. we will see if the issues stays or goes away. is donald trump mentioning the harvard legal scholar s comments saying that there is a potential legal issue that ted cruz would have to face if he is according to constitution a natural-born citizen? he is. he brought it up today. he brought up the fact that this scholar who is not only somebody who is a well respected person when it comes to constitutional law, he is from harvard law school where ted cruz went to, and maybe an inside jab at ted cruz when cruz said to trump or actually said to those of us asking cruz questions last week about it. i think that we just had a te technical glitch with dana, but you got the gist. and rand paul said that, half