Warrant for donald trump. An Appeals Court opinion states, quote, the District Court found probable cause to search the twitter account for evidence of criminal offenses. Turns out that twitter and jack smith Squared Off On Whether Trump should be told about the Search Warrant, with the Federal Court ultimately ruling to keep the warrant a secret from trump. It says that, quote, the District Court found there was reasonable grounds to believe that disclosing the warrant to former President Trump would seriously jeopardize the Ongoing Investigation by giving him an opportunity to destroy evidence, change patterns of behavior or notify confederates. Its hard to remember now given that the expresident was banned for twitter for years and has not posted since his return, but his twitter account was one of the most powerful weapons in the aftermath of the 2020 election. He used it to spread baseless Conspiracy Theories to his millions of followers and urged his supporters to go to washingto
Rights could be limited if theres a nondisclosure order in the case. Of course this is also coming as we are learning more about a foiled plot in ukraine when it comes to ukrainian president zelenskyy. What we are hearing about this informant. He was apparently passing along key intelligence about the ukrainian leader. Also tonight, we have one of the greatest athletes of all time here to join us. Katie ledecky has swung her way into the world record books, defeating Michael Phelps, taking out one of his titles he previously held. Well talk to her live in just a moment. Im kaitlan collins, and this is the source. As we noted, tonight we are waiting to potentially hear any moment from the judge overseeing the 2020 election interference case. As we wait, the Special Counsels team has just responded to trump and his attorneys from a filing they sent in just about three hours ago, where they complain that his Free Speech Rights could be limited if theres a nondisclosure order over evidence
positions are a loser for them, not just among democratic voters or independent voters, but among their own voters? that s the million dollar question, right? i think as these losses continue to pile up, you are beginning the see some republican operatives and stakeholders and donors asking tough questions. there was news recently about a mega donor to ron desantis who has decided to pause on his contributions because he thinks the candidate is, quote, too extreme on abortion. and that raised a lot of eyebrows on our side, because it sounds like the establishment republicans are beginning to be caution and concerned. the candidates, however, are too far out there and extremists are too much in control of the infrastructure in the states we saw. it s important to note again, franklin rhodes, who championed this prop 1 is the candidate who is going to potentially be running against sherrod brown. so he made himself the face of the defense of abortion
restrictions up to the states. the percentage who prefer to instead push for further restricts on abortion nationwide has doubled to 34%. they now lean in favor of state level restrictions 66% to 34%. do you think your republican colleagues are feeling pressure? do you hear that when you talk to them to play to the base on this issue? i think we witnessed the power of the people and that issues matter and that messaging matters. so i think that republicans do need to reevaluate their strategy. i think you re starting to see some republicans come around. we had, again, some republicans, goran ivanisevic john kasich and bob taft who supported issue 1. i m not sure where they stand on the effort that will take place in november. but what i do know is no one wants to be on the extreme side of things. and so in a state like ohio, after the dobbs decision was made and roe v. wade was
sure enough it s not. it s bits and pieces of misinformation. it is additionally compelling what you hear witnesses lay out exactly what happened. these witnesses are going to be keep for building willis s case. if you are willis, how do you deploy them in a way that tell as clear, linear narrative? well, it appears that willis may be looking at several different schemes and maybe even using the rico statute to bring them all together. keeping those straight could be a challenge for a jury. my guess is she would tell the story in chapters. she would talk about the fake electors chapter, the threat to poll workers chapter and threatening of the officials and georgia state legislature might be its own chapter. we would hear from witnesses who could tell their stories so people could understand. i think one thing that is particularly compelling and that will give these witnesses credibility is many of these witnesses are republicans. it shouldn t matter whether you re a democrat or re