media, did somebody post something like we had in the new york city case back in december bragging about it? you know, it sounds like we have pretty good witness in the first place to have the vehicle description, the person description, and the fact that the witness told the police that the individual doing the shooting didn t say anything, just gunned down the officer and then fired more bullets into him while he was on the ground, not saying a word. so the fact that there is a witness close enough to call the police and make those kind of statements regarding what happened would indicate that under if they do get a person into custody, that they should have a pretty good way to identify them, at least from a witness account and then, of course, you ll have the ballistic examinations later with the bullets and the firearm. if that happens. also, if they caught somebody this morning, they should still have gun powder residue on the hand that fired the weapon. so if that is true that t
but we had a crime committed without an eyewitness. and this was a very, very close case. ballistic experts reexamined the evidence and the level of trajectory. if you re handing a gun, there is a lot of weight there. the chances of holding a gun to be perfectly flat, again, very, very unlikely. because i would expect it to be upward, instead of straight across. the medical examiner found no gunpowder residue around julio torres entrance wound. so investigators wanted to find out the distance between julio and the gun when it was fired. a bullet isn t the only thing that comes out of the rifle when fired.
and they settled. the city settled, each family is getting one and a half million dollars. welcome to america. that s what happens most of the time. let me just say this also. i don t know if it s true or not, but i watched the defense lawyer in a post verdict interview say that both the decedents had gun powder residue on the hand they don t know if they got rid of the weapon or they ever had weapons at all. that was an interesting fact. on the radio, all these officers kept hearing, they re firing they re firing. this officer, in his mind reasonably believed shots were being fired. i want to ask you this. the doj has now swooped in they are now concluding today that there was a reasonable cause to believe that cleveland cops engaged in unreasonable unnecessary force and that they may be biassed and discriminatory as well. now the doj has come out today
and this was a very, very close case. ballistic experts reexamined the evidence and the level of trajectory. if you re handing a gun, there is a lot of weight there. the chances of holding a gun to be perfectly flat, again, very, very unlikely. because i would expect it to be upward, instead of straight across. the medical examiner found no gunpowder residue around julio torres entrance wound. so investigators wanted to find out the distance between julio and the gun when it was fired. a bullet isn t the only thing that comes out of the rifle when fired. gases and gunpowder do, too. brown s rifle, a .22-caliber savage model 99 was tested at the oregon state police lab.
translator: the gun powder residue only appears on ann, in her hands and in her clothes. but forensic tests found no significant residue on ann s hands. and ann s attorney says the residue on her clothes does not prove she fired the gun. translator: if someone shoots a firearm, the gun powder residue can end up coating another person s clothes. what would have been ann bender s motive for killing her husband? they were having problems because ann was frequently taking trips out of the country to buy precious stones and jewels. jewels found around the couple s mansion during the investigation. authorities removed them from the house by the suitcase load. we actually met.