With pier 70 pr since then, the port and office staff have been moving forward with the direction in the legislation. Im going to briefly go into the proposed terms of the mo u. Its for 3 year period with 12month extension. The 12month expectation is subject to the approval of the director for the port as well as the director for the Housing Office. The lease structure is for 75 years. On the condition that we will be ref job tax credits. The mo u equally include the developer will be paying for the cost of the development so it covers construction and predevelopment and financing for the Affordable Housing. However, the port would be paying for the parking garage component as the parking garage is supposed to get done. The project approval itself the terms of the mo u the project itself is subject to public review and clearance and super clearance. Prior to designating is the process to the Housing Office so on the port being the lead in issuing the rfp the Mayors Office of housing wi
Im going to briefly go into the proposed terms of the mo u. Its for 3 year period with 12month extension. The 12month expectation is subject to the approval of the director for the port as well as the director for the Housing Office. The lease structure is for 75 years. On the condition that we will be ref job tax credits. The mo u equally include the developer will be paying for the cost of the development so it covers construction and predevelopment and financing for the Affordable Housing. However, the port would be paying for the parking garage component as the parking garage is supposed to get done. The project approval itself the terms of the mo u the project itself is subject to public review and clearance and super clearance. Prior to designating is the process to the Housing Office so on the port being the lead in issuing the rfp the Mayors Office of housing will be issuing the rfp for following the stand out on the customary process for slektd a nonprofit developer to do a Af
Which is to develop Affordable Housing open the site and use the fundraising for that to help with pier 70 pr since then, the port and office staff have been moving forward with the direction in the legislation. Im going to briefly go into the proposed terms of the mo u. Its for 3 year period with 12month extension. The 12month expectation is subject to the approval of the director for the port as well as the director for the Housing Office. The lease structure is for 75 years. On the condition that we will be ref job tax credits. The mo u equally include the developer will be paying for the cost of the development so it covers construction and predevelopment and financing for the Affordable Housing. However, the port would be paying for the parking garage component as the parking garage is supposed to get done. The project approval itself the terms of the mo u the project itself is subject to public review and clearance and super clearance. Prior to designating is the process to the H
You read the newspaper in his other life hes a geologist and on another argument this was too costly and too time consuming and would eat up the resources of the planning staff. That argument was made previously and i think that this commission should not take into account if its something 3 needs to be done the Mayors Office will make it happen thank you any other member of the public wish to speak. Seeing none, well close and bring it back to commission. Ill leadoff. At first blush i was hesitating on adding the process, however, thinking about it and the length of time to get to the board of appeals and the amen of time between a project starting and finishing the board of appeals i mean, i think they would not be experts in the field to make sdergsz i think it might go sideways. Bringing it back to the eshthsz r o strengthens the case and would cause folks hesitation on going to the board of appeals if the e r o confirms their decision. I believe this would be a benefit to the proc
Comment first year i think at any time highly problematic so have a mechanism whereby you appeal you have to use the Building Permit to that address the environmental officer. In that case you can delay the process every longer because you can wait until the actual permit t is issued. So if thats the last approval then i have a mechanism to rely on in that respect by appealing the Building Permit itself but to use the permit as an excuse to royal the decision by the environmental officer is problematic. And with respect to the integrity of the planning staff and city departments and everything. Id like to remind everyone that the city lost the case on the bicycling plan and the judge ruled it had to be back for an vial report and the city lost the Housing Element eir so its not also the case the city makes the correct distressing. Tim collins said i dont know if you read the newspaper in his other life hes a geologist and on another argument this was too costly and too time consuming a